Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts
"Charles Darwin admitted that the sudden appearance of fully formed creatures in fossil deposits was one of the biggest problems with his hypothesis that nature generated living creatures through natural selection."

What a preposterous position upon which to attempt to refute Darwin. Do you even read this crap before you post it?

This condition can only be satisfied when ALL fossil evidence is available. Obviously no one can make the assertion that no fossil remains undiscovered and that a conclusion can now be made that the Darwinopterus "suddenly" and "spontaneously" appeared.

6 posted on 10/21/2009 8:43:21 AM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Natural Law

LOL...the more fossils they find, the worse it gets for darwood’s evo-religous creation myth. Do your homework for a change.


12 posted on 10/21/2009 8:55:53 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Natural Law

As usual, they have cherry-picked one sentence upon which to base their claims against evolution. Go to G-Cube’s link, scroll to the bottom, click on the first link provided for the real story.


17 posted on 10/21/2009 9:04:57 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Natural Law
fully formed creatures

This is one of those creationist phrases that just strikes me as ignorant. What does it mean? What is a non fully formed creature and why do they expect to find fossils of them?
24 posted on 10/21/2009 10:49:50 AM PDT by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson