Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bruinbirdman
Mrs Clinton is said to be worried by Mr Cameron’s promise to hold a referendum on the Lisbon treaty if it is not ratified by the time of the next election

Both Labour and Conservatives promised a referendum in their 2005 manifestos. Labour won and in due course weasled out of any referendum and, in fact, any serious debate on the treaty itself, just ramming it thru' parliament asap, like the scum they are. The thing to remember about Lisbon is that it's the EU Constitution that was rejected earlier, in all but name. It's also a self-amending treaty so there need never be another one, the EU will have carte blanche from now on. Cameron should hold a referendum regardless but he won't, he's gutless to stand up to the forces driving the undemocratic EU "project".

11 posted on 10/20/2009 9:41:29 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 1066AD
"Cameron should hold a referendum regardless but he won't"

The Lisbon Constitution/Treaty was passed by UK Parliament and signed by Brown.

When Tories and Cameron win next Spring, the Tory majority can opt out of the Treaty by giving notice. They don't need a referendum.

Kinda like GW gave notice to the Rooskies that U.S.A. was out of the ABM treaty in 2001.

A UK Lisbon Treaty referendum would be nice, also.

yitbos

12 posted on 10/20/2009 10:02:13 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson