Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY House race seen as test for GOP, Obama (AP)
Approved Propagand (AP) via Google ^ | October 18, 2009 | VALERIE BAUMAN

Posted on 10/18/2009 7:06:26 AM PDT by cc2k

ALBANY, N.Y. — President Barack Obama and former President Bill Clinton are lending their political star power to an unlikely Democratic bid to win a special congressional election in an area that's been a Republican bastion for more than a century.

The Nov. 3 contest in upstate New York's 23rd Congressional District, a sprawling, 11-county area where registered Republicans outnumber Democrats by 45,000, is shaping up as a test of a struggling GOP and a possible gauge of Obama's coattails.

<snip>

Democrats see an opening in the traditionally Republican district because Scozzafava and Hoffman are splitting the conservative vote.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: doughoffman; hoffman; ny2009; ny23; rino; scozzafava
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: 9YearLurker

Doug Hoffman is a registered Republican. He is not part of a third-party movement.

The leadership of the Conservative Party NY do not consider themselves to be “3rd-party movement people.” They work intelligently, often cross-endorsing candidates, at times leaving their line empty, and in situations like NY23: running a superior candidate .... leaving the RINO in 3rd place where she belongs.

This is a wonderful development.


21 posted on 10/18/2009 8:01:56 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT ("pray without ceasing" - Paul of Tarsus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

I used to live in NY, I understand their CP—and that DH is a Republican. I just hope that third partiers aren’t the ones who take a lesson from this—and I’m not sure who else will.


22 posted on 10/18/2009 8:04:31 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nathan James

No, I don’t.


23 posted on 10/18/2009 8:12:25 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
So the right-leaning split votes total over 50% with the Dem checking in at 33%. Yet the Dem is “riding the coattails” of The Won? LOL.

You can’t make this stuff up.”

Yup.
Youn just gotta laugh at the sheer brazeness of the Pravda Associalistic Press. George Orwell’s 1984 is very much with us right now..in America’s State run Media.

24 posted on 10/18/2009 8:20:36 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
It’s really a bad situation all around, I’m afraid.”

You couldn't be more wrong.
It's a win win for conservatives and Republicans.
it's far, far better for the Republican Party for Scozzafava to lose, than for her to win.
Having a pro-ACORN, pro cap and trade, pro gay marriage, Scozzafava sitting in the House as a Republican, would be much worse than having the 0bamacare supporting Olympia Snowe sitting in the US Senate as a Republican.

25 posted on 10/18/2009 8:27:33 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Hey, I said that it’d be good for his district and for his votes, bad if he loses.

It’s only the risk of it’s misdirecting energy into third-party challenges that is dangerous. And that could become the larger effect.


26 posted on 10/18/2009 8:30:40 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

This race shows the conservative patriots what happens when you sit back and do nothing. (Dede gets the nomination.)

Then it shows them what happens when they get active. And nothing can happen if they don’t get active.

Grassroots Rules.

(of course, not all are active. This was a 5-month campaign and NYS Right-to-Life waited until Oct 5 to give an endorsement and then gave a somewhat useless endorsement. Did they even mail it to their membership? This type of mentality will be tolerated for how many more decades?)


27 posted on 10/18/2009 8:33:25 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT ("pray without ceasing" - Paul of Tarsus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
It’s only the risk of it’s misdirecting energy into third-party challenges that is dangerous. And that could become the larger effect”

Like “campaignPete R-CT" said in his post, Doug Hoffman is a registered Republican. He is not part of a third-party movement.

28 posted on 10/18/2009 8:35:46 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Technically the CP is a ‘third-party’, and as I said to Peter R-CT I know he’s a Republican. The danger is third partiers taking the wrong lesson from the race. But I’m repeating myself, so I’m probably not making my point with you any better than I did in my original postings.


29 posted on 10/18/2009 8:38:16 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

What exactly do you suggest?


30 posted on 10/18/2009 8:40:32 AM PDT by Nathan James
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
The Republican Party and the Conservative Party in District 23 need to sit down and work out a deal.

exactly.

31 posted on 10/18/2009 8:51:10 AM PDT by BAW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

“The Republican Party and the Conservative Party in District 23 need to sit down and work out a deal.”

How do you differentiate the Republican party (NY and RNC) from the Democrats?


32 posted on 10/18/2009 8:58:51 AM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (We are an Oligarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
The Republican Party and the Conservative Party in District 23 need to sit down and work out a deal.

What deal? The Stupid Party selected this RINO turd over a bunch of other qualified conservative candidates. If Hoffman would have been selected to run none of this crap would be happening.

33 posted on 10/18/2009 9:08:19 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (90% of the fedgov is unconstitutional. The other 10% besides the military doesnt know what it's doin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Only way they can win is to have 3rd party candidates jump in. If the Republicans are going to play along and support RINOs, then people need to wise up quick and throw their vote behind someone who will truly represent them.


34 posted on 10/18/2009 10:49:13 AM PDT by samsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

Scozzafava and Hoffman are splitting the conservative vote.

No, they’re splitting the Republican vote, the conservative vote, AP, is going to Hoffman!


35 posted on 10/18/2009 10:55:28 AM PDT by JSDude1 (www.wethepeopleindiana.org (Tea Party Member-Proud), www.travishankins.com (R- IN 09 2010!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_fusion
Electoral fusion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. Please improve this article and discuss the issue on the talk page.

Electoral fusion is an arrangement where two or more political parties support a common candidate, pooling the votes for all those parties. By offering to endorse or nominate a major party’s candidate, minor parties can influence the candidate’s platform.

Contents [hide]
1 History
1.1 United Kingdom
1.2 United States
1.2.1 New York
1.2.2 Oregon
2 See also
3 External links
4 Articles
5 References

[edit] History

In 1864 the Democratic Party split into two wings, over the peace question. The War Democrats fused with the Republicans to elect a Democratic Vice President, Andrew Johnson, and re-elect a Republican President, Abraham Lincoln.

Occasionally, popular candidates for local office have succeeded in being nominated by both Republican and Democratic Parties. In 1946, prior to the current ban on fusion being enacted in that state, Republican Governor of California Earl Warren (a future Chief Justice of the United States) managed to win the nominations of the Republican, Democratic, and Progressive Parties.

In the 1991 Louisiana gubernatorial election, controversial white supremacist David Duke, running as a Republican, unexpectedly made his way to second place in the state’s jungle primary. Many prominent Republicans endorsed his Democratic opponent Edwin Edwards. While not a de jure example of electoral fusion, it was an unusual example of both major parties joining against a candidate.

[edit] New York
See also: Elections in New York and Qualified New York Parties
Fusion has the highest profile in New York, where it was a major weapon against Tammany Hall. Small parties significant in large part for their fused ballot lines include the Working Families Party, Right to Life Party, Liberal Party, Independence Party, and Conservative Party. Most judicial elections are won by candidates endorsed by more than two parties.

In the 2002 New York gubernatorial election, Andrew Cuomo got the New York State Liberal Party nomination, and was running against Carl McCall for the Democratic nomination. McCall had secured the Working Families Party nomination. Cuomo dropped out, and endorsed McCall. This led to the Liberal party not getting the 50,000 votes for governor that it needed for an automatic place on the ballot, and led to the Liberal party becoming defunct.

Please add this to your profile in as it could clear up some confusion in this race! J.S.


36 posted on 10/18/2009 11:05:57 AM PDT by JSDude1 (www.wethepeopleindiana.org (Tea Party Member-Proud), www.travishankins.com (R- IN 09 2010!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

The Dems want Texas I was reading DU the other night and they were bragging how Texas is more blue now and that they should all concentrate on and campaign for Democrats running in any TX election.


37 posted on 10/18/2009 11:32:22 AM PDT by mojitojoe (“Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.” - Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

They aren’t splitting the conservative vote. Hoffman is sttracting the conservatives. The Liberal appointed by the GOP is attracting the party first crowd.

As for Obama...LOL

Sorry Libs, try as you might but your pet blue dogs in Congress aren’t going to believe a race where the “Republican” and the “Conservative” carry the majority vote as a referendum endorsing your agenda. This is a battle between the GOP establishment and conservatives. You guys are just bystanders hoping to benefit from the fall out because your agenda isn’t enough to win it for you.


38 posted on 10/18/2009 12:07:41 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

I doubt it. The GOP is doing a fine job all on its on nominating Liberals to run for office splitting votes. They don’t need SOROS’ bankroll.


39 posted on 10/18/2009 12:11:31 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nathan James
No,the determined headlong charge by the Republicrats to the left is the danger.
40 posted on 10/18/2009 5:48:27 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson