Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WARNING! Goodbye U.S Sovereignty... Hello One World Government!(Obama to Cede US Sovereignty)
YouTube ^ | Oct. 16, 2009 | Lord Monckton

Posted on 10/17/2009 11:19:40 AM PDT by Anita1

Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty in Copenhagen, Claims British Lord Monckton . . .

"And the trouble is this; if that treaty is signed, if your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution (sic), and you can’t resign from that treaty unless you get agreement from all the other state parties – And because you’ll be the biggest paying country, they’re not going to let you out of it.

So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege merely to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free. But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever.

*** And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is. I’ve read the treaty. I’ve seen this stuff about [world] government and climate debt and enforcement. They are going to do this to you whether you like it or not . . .

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/10/16/obama-poised-to-cede-us-sovereignty-in-copenhagen-claims-british-lord-monckton/

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: bob152; british; copenhagen; lordmonckton; obama; sovereignty; treaty; ussovereignty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last
To: All

http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff306.htm

In the final analysis, the grand total of money to be looted from American taxpayers as a result of Obama’s commitments at the G 20 conference could easily surpass trillions of dollars. In a major understatement, the official conference document calls it “unprecedented and concerted fiscal expansion.”

Nevertheless, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown declared that “A new world order is emerging and with it we’re entering into a new era of international cooperation.”

But viewed in another light, Obama has sold out the sovereignty of the United States and has laid the groundwork for the death of the U.S. dollar as the world’s dominant currency. While President Bush started this insidious process of holding G 20 meetings, Obama has taken the process much further down the road. It is truly unprecedented.


81 posted on 10/17/2009 10:26:13 PM PDT by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice

VATICAN BACKS OBAMA’S GLOBAL AGENDA

http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff359.htm

While our media sleep, the United Nations is proceeding, with President Obama’s acquiescence, to implement a global plan to create a new international socialist order financed by global taxes on the American people.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff323.htm

COMMUNIST U.N. BOSS PRAISES “MOTHER EARTH”

http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff325.htm


82 posted on 10/17/2009 10:31:28 PM PDT by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Anita1

The full presentation should be required viewing for everyone. Even leaving aside the warning at the end, it is by far the best overall confutation of the global warming scam I have ever seen. It literally takes it apart, point by point.


83 posted on 10/18/2009 1:41:11 AM PDT by Nipfan (The desire to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it - H L Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anita1

This must be on target because the You tube comments have changed to attacking the messenger. Probably on Obama payroll. Many of the profiles are recent.


84 posted on 10/18/2009 11:28:10 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: opentalk; All

We are fighting for th Soul of America! If people do Not wake up Now - before it is too late - we will Not have a nation anymore.

I am not an alarmist - I am a realist!

We need to Sound the Alarm to everone who will listen and Believe!


85 posted on 10/18/2009 12:12:32 PM PDT by Anita1 ("Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

Key word “silent”. Yes they do not have a majority, but they sure can raise hell about it. The tea party is a lot louder than the Republican party.


86 posted on 10/19/2009 9:37:26 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

That is ONLY if it does not apply to end of the US Constitution.

How can a person on one hand say it’s Constitutional to say the US Constitution is NOT the law of the land. LOL! It’s an oxymoron if you think about it.


87 posted on 10/19/2009 9:40:17 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

Raise hell; go ahead. You’re missing the point - 34 Senators are ALL IT TAKES to approve the treaty. And there are at LEAST 34 completely safe Democrat Senate seats. CA, NY, IL, WA, OR, CT, MA, and on and on. Someone with anything other than (D) after their name will lose those seats, every time.

It’s not about raising hell; it’s too late for that. Elections have consequences, and too many conservatives slit their own throats in November when they “refused to vote for a RINO”... Well, we’re seeing the effects.


88 posted on 10/20/2009 8:50:58 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518
How can a person on one hand say it’s Constitutional to say the US Constitution is NOT the law of the land. LOL! It’s an oxymoron if you think about it.

Read Article 6. The treaties EXTEND and CO-EXIST with the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land. That's what is in the Constitution. Treaties approved by 2/3rds of the Senators present are considered part of the Supreme Law of the Land.

Read the Constitution, you'll see your argument is moot; it's not saying what you think it says.

89 posted on 10/20/2009 8:53:02 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Anita1
As the frauds continue to run around trying to convince others to vote for their party insiders....They'll never admit that our electoral process has already been undermined and compromised by government.

Those capable of critical thought understand, a government that refuses to protect and secure it's own legitimate sovereign borders will itself eventually become illegitimate.

90 posted on 10/20/2009 9:02:53 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier; Sprite518
Elections have consequences

So do wide open lawless borders. Those capable of critical thought understand, a government that refuses to protect and secure it's own legitimate sovereign borders will itself eventually become illegitimate.

and too many conservatives slit their own throats in November when they “refused to vote for a RINO”... Well, we’re seeing the effects.

I have a new campaign slogan for your political party.

"Compromise before principle, profits regardless of consequences."

As the frauds try to convince others to vote for their party insiders....They'll never admit that our electoral process has already been undermined and compromised by government and both beltway parties

91 posted on 10/20/2009 9:10:16 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
So do wide open lawless borders. Those capable of critical thought understand, a government that refuses to protect and secure it's own legitimate sovereign borders will itself eventually become illegitimate.

WTF does that have to do with this thread?

"Compromise before principle, profits regardless of consequences."

You should heed Reagan's advice:

"When I began entering into the give and take of legislative bargaining in Sacramento, a lot of the most radical conservatives who had supported me during the election didn't like it.

"Compromise" was a dirty word to them and they wouldn't face the fact that we couldn't get all of what we wanted today. They wanted all or nothing and they wanted it all at once. If you don't get it all, some said, don't take anything.

"I'd learned while negotiating union contracts that you seldom got everything you asked for. And I agreed with FDR, who said in 1933: 'I have no expectations of making a hit every time I come to bat. What I seek is the highest possible batting average.'

"If you got seventy-five or eighty percent of what you were asking for, I say, you take it and fight for the rest later, and that's what I told these radical conservatives who never got used to it.

With those you agree 60-70-80% of the time you still stand a chance to influence to your way of thinking; with those you agree 10% of the time you stand no chance. Vote offensively (for the strongest conservative) in the primaries; vote defensively (for the candidate least likely to do harm) in the general.

Do you seriously think it would be harder to influence a President McCain or Senator Graham than President Obama or Senator Reid? Ideological purists like you are one of the reasons conservatism is getting whacked; re-read that quote by Reagan and think long and hard about it...

92 posted on 10/20/2009 3:34:07 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

What Reagan said applies when the other side moves your way. However, now the GOP compromises by yielding and allowing the Liberals to dictate everything. They might get some minor point taken out, but there is nothing of a conservative nature in the final bill.


93 posted on 10/21/2009 6:26:26 AM PDT by Ingtar (Asses far Left of me; Rinos to the Left; FReepin' on the Right with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: beckysueb

God is in control of everything, but that doesn’t obviate the responsibility He has given to all of us to work out His will.
In other words, time to start saying “No, Mr President. You cannot do that.”


94 posted on 11/13/2009 9:09:40 AM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

I’ll take that bet. Millions of Americans armed to the teeth mean squat unless the political will and organisation exists to use said weapons in this cause.

And there’s not much sign at present it does.


95 posted on 11/13/2009 9:11:54 AM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paved Paradise

Lord Monckton - ex advisor to Maggie Thatcher. Big anti global warming guru.


96 posted on 11/13/2009 9:13:01 AM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson