1 posted on
10/17/2009 9:58:34 AM PDT by
yongin
To: yongin
Sick em Sarah, Liz, Barbara, jam your spiked heels into the backs of liberals and make them eat out of a mongrammed doggie dish.
2 posted on
10/17/2009 10:03:00 AM PDT by
HerrBlucher
(Obamanos!)
To: yongin
Cue the RINOs and Mittbots who will cry "she's launching a third party!" and whine about Ross Perot.
A political GROUP is not a party.
I don't hold my breath until the kool-aid brigade arrives... 3... 2... 1...
3 posted on
10/17/2009 10:03:56 AM PDT by
SolidWood
(Sarah Palin: "Only dead fish go with the flow!")
To: yongin
I don’t think I can stand anymore junk mail..............
4 posted on
10/17/2009 10:04:10 AM PDT by
stayathomemom
(Beware of cat attacks while typing!)
To: yongin
It’s quite obvious that Allahpundit has the hots for Mitt.
5 posted on
10/17/2009 10:05:32 AM PDT by
SolidWood
(Sarah Palin: "Only dead fish go with the flow!")
To: yongin
7 posted on
10/17/2009 10:07:03 AM PDT by
GOP Poet
(Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
To: yongin
The big question is whether it positions itself as fundamentally libertarian, replete with attacks on the Fed per the Paulnuts favorite hobbyhorse, or fundamentally Republican and in line with mainstream GOP talking points. My guess is the former, given how shes trying to cast herself as a populist/purist conservative outsider as an alternative to Mitt and Huck. Youll know shes serious when she comes out for legalizing weed.What's with the false choice and the libertarian bent?
Sarah needs to cast her self neither as a GOP mainstreamer nor a libertarian.
Sarah needs to cast herself as constitutionalist working within the Republican party.
8 posted on
10/17/2009 10:07:40 AM PDT by
FreeReign
To: yongin
I don’t know why they are starting their own. It will just splinter the conservative movement. Why not join with the people instead of asking the people to join you.
To: yongin
How about this: “Conservatives 4 Palin” is a Palin-centered group, Stand Up For Our Nation is an issues-centered group and the bare bones of a new party. Just my guess.
10 posted on
10/17/2009 10:10:40 AM PDT by
Grut
To: yongin
Go Sarah 2012! Our country desperately needs your common sense conservatism and your leadership!
11 posted on
10/17/2009 10:16:52 AM PDT by
nj26
(Say NO to Socialism! Government is NOT the Answer.)
To: yongin
It’s all about money, always has been.
13 posted on
10/17/2009 10:28:33 AM PDT by
Bob J
("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one strikes at it's root.")
To: yongin
Youll know shes serious when she comes out for legalizing weed.Just like the leftists on the Alaska Supreme Court did? Right.
16 posted on
10/17/2009 10:41:01 AM PDT by
Mojave
(Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
To: yongin
Moveon.org, Act Up, Action Now, Media Matters, Kos, DU etc etc wasn't enough for the Fascists, they had to set up Organizing for America too.
Glad to see someone on our side finally learning how to fight back.
17 posted on
10/17/2009 10:41:35 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(Note to the GOP: Do not count your votes until they are cast.)
To: yongin
Sarah/Liz 2012 and I don’t care what party they run under. Both will kick azz.
19 posted on
10/17/2009 10:50:05 AM PDT by
VRWC For Truth
(Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bail out)
To: yongin
25 posted on
10/17/2009 11:09:05 AM PDT by
deport
To: yongin
Or maybe Stand Up For Our Nation is itself a group aimed at foreign policy thatll end up competing with Cheneys for donations. Which would be
weird. I suspect Sarah's will be more oriented toward domestic issues, and some of those, such as energy, will overlap with the foreign issues from time to time. At those points, she and Liz can work together, and the combination will be even more powerful than each of those women on their own!
35 posted on
10/18/2009 11:16:46 AM PDT by
SuziQ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson