Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Lord Monckton Said At Dinner . .
Right Side News ^ | October 17, 2009 | Kirsten Lombard

Posted on 10/17/2009 4:12:17 AM PDT by RightSideNews

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 10/17/2009 4:12:17 AM PDT by RightSideNews
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightSideNews

Global warming is absolutely a scam intended to:

1) Socialize America further.
2) Transfer wealth from America elsewhere.
3) Reduce our average standard of living.
4) Cripple our industrial production and progress.
5) Give China, Russia and India a pass and chance to compete.

Somehow we must find a way to block this treaty!


2 posted on 10/17/2009 4:17:24 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightSideNews
If Obama tries to somehow invalidate or override our constitution, there will a second revolution.

In fact, maybe that's exactly what is needed.

3 posted on 10/17/2009 4:20:44 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies (For good judgment ask...What would Obama do? Then do the opposite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

I’ve always said, it’s his politics that are going to really hurt the African/American community in the end. He is to the black people, what Jimmy Carter was to Evangelicals, the Christian voters got him in, but in the end, it was Evangelicals who suffered the most with his peddling the ERA doctrine, another amendment we HAD to add to the Constitution, surprisingly we got all just find without it ever being passed.


4 posted on 10/17/2009 4:36:58 AM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez

You are sooooo right!


5 posted on 10/17/2009 4:38:07 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies (For good judgment ask...What would Obama do? Then do the opposite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RightSideNews

Clinton signed Kyoto I it never went anywhere. Never even came up for a vote.

The people are the sovereigns in the USA, not the government. The government serves at the consent of the governed. The USA is(was0 a representative republic, with a written Constitution, not a democracy. Venezuela was a democracy.

Going to be tough times for Obama...


6 posted on 10/17/2009 4:46:37 AM PDT by Tarpon (Oba-Mao is a reader, not a leader ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightSideNews
"This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; . . . any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Contrary to the article, it would appear that our wise Framers did not intend Treaties to supersede the Constitution. Of course, the five blackrobes on Scotus who believe Nigerian Law should be considered in their deliberations will likely thing otherwise.

7 posted on 10/17/2009 4:50:45 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Understand Natural Law to understand our Declaration of Independence & Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; penelopesire; Bahbah; Miss Didi; holdonnow; Dog; AliVeritas

While we’re occupied with trying to keep health-care reform from passing- the global leftists are busy bees- the Copenhagen Treaty is ready to assault our constitution and we need to start hollering -it’s due to be signed in December.


8 posted on 10/17/2009 4:54:17 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightSideNews

Mentioned in the article “With wealth comes a cleaner environment.”

I have been saying this for quite some time. Once they destroy/redistribute the wealth, we will not have enough left over to care about a clean environment. The environmentalists will be puzzled when this happens. They only have to open their eyes to see it in practice.


9 posted on 10/17/2009 4:57:44 AM PDT by listenhillary (A "cult of personality" arises when a leader uses mass media creating idealized/heroic public image)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

Yes, I’ve been saying that as well. Thanks for the reminder!


10 posted on 10/17/2009 5:07:34 AM PDT by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RightSideNews

Is there any condensed version of this in English that provides talking points we can use with our Congressional representatives?


11 posted on 10/17/2009 5:11:11 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightSideNews

Yet another assault on American sovereignty by the leftists at the direction of the anointed one and his 0bamunists. This is completely anti-Constitutional and should NEVER even come up for ratification.

Please notify your Senators and Representative to oppose this treaty in any of its evil forms. We are tired of the socialist left apologizing for every perceived slight on the international stage as if it’s America’s fault.

It’s time to take back the country.


12 posted on 10/17/2009 5:20:10 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightSideNews; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; Normandy; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

13 posted on 10/17/2009 5:23:39 AM PDT by steelyourfaith (Limit all U.S. politicians to two terms: One in office and one in prison!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightSideNews

Related:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2364497/posts


14 posted on 10/17/2009 5:31:14 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
To be valid, treaties must be made, “under the Authority of the United States.” The “Authority of the United States” comes from the Constitution. Hence, I would argue no treaty can supersede the Constitution.
15 posted on 10/17/2009 5:41:01 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightSideNews

Saving for our home schoolers


16 posted on 10/17/2009 5:46:15 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightSideNews
An open letter from The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley to Senator John McCain about Climate...

British Lord Stings Senators Rockefeller and Snowe: 'Uphold Free Speech or Resign'

17 posted on 10/17/2009 5:49:15 AM PDT by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

Every day it’s a new one...will this nightmare ever end??? Has anyone mentioned this on Fox or talk radio?


18 posted on 10/17/2009 6:05:00 AM PDT by Miss Didi ( "After all...tomorrow is another day." Scarlett O'Hara, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightSideNews

It is a logical impossibility for any treaty to supersede the Constitution. For the same reason it’s a logical impossibility for any Act of Congress to do so.

The US Constitution allows no such thing. The language of Article VI is commonly misinterpreted that way by ignoramuses, but the historical record regarding the original intent is emphatically clear that the Constitution itself is the supreme law of the US, and no lesser law or treaty has the power to circumvent it. Which is in fact the originally intended semantics of the language in Article VI (read very carefully):

“****This Constitution****, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

The Constitution also states that the only way to change it is to officially amend it—and treaties are not, de jure, amendments. ... Read More

Unless it is officially amended, treaties are subject to the same limitation as any Act of Congress: They must a) not violate the restrictions the Constitution places on government action, and b) be justified by an explicit enumerated power granted to the government by the Constitution. The power to make treaties does not grant any power to violate the Constitution itself, any more than the power to make laws does. Laws can be declared Unconstitutional in spite of the language of Article VI—and so can treaties, for the same reasons.


19 posted on 10/17/2009 6:17:31 AM PDT by sourcery (Those whom the gods would destroy they first make socialist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery; RightSideNews
Unless it is officially amended, treaties are subject to the same limitation as any Act of Congress: They must a) not violate the restrictions the Constitution places on government action,

Like that's never been done before in the absence of "official" amendments.
20 posted on 10/17/2009 6:22:28 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson