Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich endorses Scozzafava in NY-23 race ('Future of the party')
The Hill ^ | Oct. 16, 2009 | Tony Romm

Posted on 10/16/2009 10:34:48 AM PDT by ConservativeMind

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) may have stepped into a political quagmire after endorsing a moderate New York Republican's special election bid.

A host of GOP leaders have tried to distance themselves from the ongoing showdown between Assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava, a centrist Republican, and Doug Hoffman, the local Conservative Party's candidate. But Gingrich offered his perspective to the three-way contest for now-Army Secretary John McHugh's vacant seat on Friday when he became one of only a handful of conservative Republicans to openly back his party's struggling candidate.

“The special election for the 23rd Congressional District is an important test leading up to the mid-term 2010 elections,” Gingrich said of Scozzafava's candidacy in a statement to supporters, as reported by the The Post-Standard. “Our best chance to put responsible and principled leaders in Washington starts here, with Dede Scozzafava.”

Gingrich's key endorsement could spell good news for Scozzafava, heretofore supported only lukewarmly by her own party. Already, the Club for Growth, Concerned Women of America, evangelical leader Gary Bauer, former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) and a host of other GOP supporters and lawmakers have sided with Hoffman, who has recently posted gains in preliminary polls.

By contrast, only about 17 Republicans have even written checks to Scozzafava's campaign, and the party's conference chairman -- Rep. Mike Pence (Ind.) -- has altogether steered clear of the tough race.

At issue for some unsure Republicans seems to be a fear of a possible political backlash. Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Tx.) knows that feeling all too well; after he announced his backing for Scozzafava, his conservative base attacked him viciously, specifically harping intimidate details of his personal life.

Gingrich, however, seems not to care about this brewing, inner-party divide. Instead, he championed Scozzafava's candidacy on Friday as the future of the party -- not necessarily the harbinger for a lingering party divide, as some pundits have speculated.

“The Republican Revolution in 1994 started very much like what we see today,” the former speaker said. “Like then, our country is reeling from misguided liberal policies, high taxes and out-of-control spending. This special election in New York’s 23rd Congressional District could be the first election of the new Republican Revolution, but we need the momentum to get it started.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: fred; fredthompson; hoffman; ny2009; ny2010; ny23; rino; rinos; scozzafava
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 next last
To: ConservativeMind
This reflects Gingrich's fatal flaw: he over-values inside baseball as opposed to principle. Bad mistake for Newt, whom I generally like and respect for his creativity and ideas. But in spite of all reason, and even personal experience, he refuses to get that the opposition is not the "loyal opposition" of the textbooks.

It is the enemy of the American Way.

121 posted on 10/16/2009 6:26:39 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard (Truth--The liberal's Kryptonite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Newt just triangulated himself right out of the next republican presidential primary.


122 posted on 10/16/2009 6:29:58 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (Ask not what you can do for your country, ask what you can do for Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Newtered Gingrich. On who’s shelf are his ‘jarred cajones’ sitting?


123 posted on 10/16/2009 6:59:42 PM PDT by kickonly88 (I love fossil fuel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

WOW! Thank you for all those links!

With “Republicans” like THAT, who even NEEDS democrats?

Meanwhile, Wonderful, decent, Conservative, Veterans like Col Allen West, Ed Lynch, and others can’t even get minimal support from the RPOF here in Florida.

It’s tragic.


124 posted on 10/16/2009 7:05:32 PM PDT by left that other site (Your Mi'KMaq Paddy Whacky Bass Playing Biker Buddy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

He endorsed Nelson A. Rockefeller in 1968 too, and this woman makes Nelson look like he was to the right of Goldwater!


125 posted on 10/16/2009 7:32:32 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

Some people did that in MT, MO, and VA in 2006, and the Democrats got three more Senate seats in the process.


126 posted on 10/16/2009 7:37:37 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

If that’s the future of the pubbie party, make mine vanilla. I will NEVER vote for such a candidate and Gingrich has just shot his teeny little pecker off as far as I’m concerned. I would no more trust him with elective office than I would trust some pedo to babysit my granddaughter... Never happen, EVER.


127 posted on 10/16/2009 8:40:13 PM PDT by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Scozzafava has a page at Project Vote Smart, will a check card of her stances on the issues:

http://www.votesmart.org/npat.php?can_id=22881#515

Not a lot there that thrills me. I wasn’t expecting Barry Goldwater, but she’s not even Olympia Snowe - Snowe at least supports the death penalty.


128 posted on 10/17/2009 2:07:25 AM PDT by DemforBush (Somebody wake me when sanity has returned to the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

Sadly, you have two choices:

Republican: slow growth big government

Democrat: fast growth big government


129 posted on 10/17/2009 4:52:01 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative
Indeed, it always amazes me when they say...they got more seats because you voted 3rd party or didn't vote. It is like it is OK to have Snowe’s, Voinoviches, et al. representing us when they are moles.

This very race demonstrates exactly what we're talking about. All this talk about taking the party back is just talk from what I see.

We don't donate to the party.
We don't support these candidates.
We don't even agree with these candidates.

And yet we're supposed to vote for them, because they have an R after their name?

I am sorry, but that is the strategy that has gotten our country into this mess. This is the strategy that has put these people in charge of “our party” and put us in a position to have to ‘take our party back?’ If we have not taken our party back by now, after last fall's defeats, we will not take congress back in any meaningful way in 2010. The only thing going to be on the ticket is a bunch of left leaning centrist republicans. Not only are Americans being ignored by DC, they are being ignored by the RNC.

Perhaps it is time to revisit history and learn the lessons of a successful third party overthrow for 2012.

130 posted on 10/17/2009 5:15:56 AM PDT by EBH (it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Then put up candidates worth voting for.


131 posted on 10/17/2009 5:17:43 AM PDT by EBH (it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Yes, this is the place to start with this election cycle. Just a mere weeks away. Let’s win it.


132 posted on 10/17/2009 6:12:07 AM PDT by maxter (Give today a chance. Enjoy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

I am done with Newt as well. Good to know where he stands.


133 posted on 10/17/2009 6:13:18 AM PDT by maxter (Give today a chance. Enjoy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: maxter

For sure. I haven’t trusted him since he failed to follow through on the Contract on /oops/ for America...


134 posted on 10/17/2009 6:14:44 AM PDT by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: DanZanRyu

If Sarah feels it worthwhile, she will enter the fray.


135 posted on 10/17/2009 6:15:20 AM PDT by maxter (Give today a chance. Enjoy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: EBH

“...revisit history and learn the
lessons of a successful third party...”
- - -
I must have missed class that day.


136 posted on 10/17/2009 6:16:24 AM PDT by Repeal The 17th (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Russ
There is no future voting for “moderates”...

What the hell is a 'moderate', anyway? If you don't take a stand on anything; why bother voting?

137 posted on 10/17/2009 6:20:53 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Russ
Things like this make me glad I left the Republican Party.

I'd rather fight than switch!

I assume you moved to the Group Thinker Party, where people never disagree.

138 posted on 10/17/2009 6:44:00 AM PDT by lonestar (Obama is turning Bush's "mess" into a catastrophe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

That hasbeen pile of crap should shut his pie hole, he’s a nobody!


139 posted on 10/17/2009 7:13:43 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
I don't need to belong to a "herd". How does belonging to a political party benefit you or vice versa? All they want from you is money and, in return, you get emtpy rhetoric and broken promises. I watch this party tout the same old names and demonize any new face that comes along with fresh ideas. It is not the party of Reagan anymore and, face the truth, it never will be again.

Of course I will vote for Republicans but I will not vote for them because they are Republicans. Those days are finished.

140 posted on 10/17/2009 8:04:56 AM PDT by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson