Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldDeckHand

Didn’t Clinton win with 43% of the vote?


8 posted on 10/15/2009 12:21:05 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: PeterPrinciple
'Didn’t Clinton win with 43% of the vote?"

Two words - Ross Perot. If it wasn't for Perot and his 19% of the vote, there's a decent chance that Clinton wouldn't have won. Absent some other third-party billionaire, 43% just ain't going to get it done for Barry in 2012.

12 posted on 10/15/2009 12:24:04 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: PeterPrinciple

Yes, with third party candidates in both elections.


17 posted on 10/15/2009 12:40:36 PM PDT by GVnana ("Obama is incredibly naive and grossly egotistical." Sarkozy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: PeterPrinciple
Didn’t Clinton win with 43% of the vote?

We have Perot to thank for that one.
38 posted on 10/15/2009 1:49:16 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: PeterPrinciple

Yes. We must make sure this is a two person race...

Obummer vs. a CONSERVATIVE!


51 posted on 10/15/2009 2:23:08 PM PDT by proudpapa (Obama - Worst One Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson