Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PeterPrinciple
'Didn’t Clinton win with 43% of the vote?"

Two words - Ross Perot. If it wasn't for Perot and his 19% of the vote, there's a decent chance that Clinton wouldn't have won. Absent some other third-party billionaire, 43% just ain't going to get it done for Barry in 2012.

12 posted on 10/15/2009 12:24:04 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: OldDeckHand

I expect the MSM to start inventing another Ross Perot anytime now for the same reason.


13 posted on 10/15/2009 12:26:46 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

Forty three percent is way too much, it needs to go to fourteen percent so that any Dim who wants to be reelected will avoid the O and his policies like the plague and he will be squashed in the election. He won’t do what Johnson did and just not run for reelection, he is far too narcissistic for that. The thing to do now is heap on the ridicule, he can’t take that.


66 posted on 10/15/2009 5:53:12 PM PDT by RipSawyer (Trying to reason with a leftist is like trying to catch sunshine in a fish net at midnight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

Speaking of that...I almost expect Hillary to resign as SoS, and run against Obama as an Independent in 2012...


73 posted on 10/15/2009 7:56:28 PM PDT by RockinRight (The liberals' idea of tax relief is to give everyone a tube of K-Y Jelly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson