Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BradtotheBone

Just the kind of successful missile defense work that will be stripped from the 0 defense budget.


2 posted on 10/14/2009 10:25:11 AM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mojito
Yep.

Anything that would ACTUALLY defend us...he finds "too costly" or some such crap.

Has anybody noticed besides me that his "shift" to the seabased defense posture (the basis for ditching Poland's land-defense interceptor missiles) ...has not been accompanied by any increase in SEABASED MISSILE DEFENSE FUNDING?! No extra Aegis ships. Zip. Nada. Zilch. And they are already overstretched in their regular missions.

6 posted on 10/14/2009 10:39:55 AM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

QUICK! A WORKING DEFENSE SYSTEM!

DEFUND IT!


25 posted on 10/15/2009 11:14:55 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson