For what? Asking for proof that someone is eligble? She is a citizen and is entitled to know.
She’s been hollering for months now that she has Obama’s birth certificate, yet never manages to turn it over to a judge.
I can connect the dots.
“For what? Asking for proof that someone is eligble? She is a citizen and is entitled to know.”
I’m with you. We’re all entitled to know, yet insults abound and no proof offered. Land’s decision is no surprise. I’m going to wait and see regarding the case pending in Carters court.
No, for bad faith, deliberate violations of the law, breathtaking arrogance, delusions, willful misconduct, and baseless attacks on the court. Did't you read the article?
No, for "asserting claims and legal positions that are not well-founded under existing law or through the modification , extension, or expansion of existing law." Also for "using the courts for a purpose unrelated to the resolution of a legitimate legal cause of action."
Of course, accusing the judge of all sorts of things, including a secret meeting with the Attorney General Holder, didn't help. I mean, she said that because he owns some Microsoft stock, and they're "aligned both politically and economically" with Obama, that he was biased and should recuse himself.
They are just TOO blind folded yet to understand the consequences of their propaganda actions and infiltrations on the internet forums!!
Hillary's PUMA.com gals warned us!!!