Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US wants bunker-buster fast, denies Iran is reason
MyWay/AP ^ | Oct 13, 6:35 AM (ET) | ANNE GEARAN

Posted on 10/13/2009 8:05:30 AM PDT by null and void

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Pentagon is speeding up delivery of a colossal bomb designed to destroy hidden weapons bunkers buried underground and shielded by 10,000 pounds of reinforced concrete.

Call it Plan B for dealing with Iran, which recently revealed a long-suspected nuclear site deep inside a mountain near the holy city of Qom.

The 15-ton behemoth will be the largest non-nuclear bomb in the U.S. arsenal.

"I don't think anybody can divine potential targets," Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said.

The administration has been careful not to take military action off the table even as it reaches out to Iran with historic talks this month. Tougher sanctions are the immediate backup if diplomacy fails to stop what the West fears is a drive for a nuclear weapon.

The MOP could, in theory, take out bunkers such as those Saddam Hussein had begun to construct for weapons programs in Iraq, or flatten the kind of cave and tunnel networks that allowed al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden to escape U.S. assault in Tora Bora, Afghanistan, shortly after the U.S. invasion in 2001.

The precision-guided bomb is designed to drill through earth and almost any underground encasement to reach weapons depots, labs or hideouts.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: defensebudget; military; nationaldefense; weaponry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
"I don't think anybody can divine potential targets," Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said.

Given the current occupant-of-the-White-House, I'd hazard Qom is less likely than Demona...

1 posted on 10/13/2009 8:05:31 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: null and void

The rush is to get it done before Obama can take it offline. He’s already said he will cut future weapons development.


2 posted on 10/13/2009 8:07:31 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Perhaps there are locations along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border where this weapons might come in handy, as well.


3 posted on 10/13/2009 8:09:11 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Big dust collectors without the political will to use them.

I don’t know if Israel has the means to deliver that thing, but they at least have the gonads to drop it, this administration sure as hell doesn’t it seems.


4 posted on 10/13/2009 8:10:41 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
The 15-ton behemoth - called the "massive ordnance penetrator," or MOP - will be the largest non-nuclear bomb in the U.S. arsenal and will carry 5,300 pounds of explosives. The bomb is about 10 times more powerful than the weapon it is designed to replace.

Compare to Barnes Wallis' Grand Slam earthquake bomb, filled with 9,135 lb of Torpex...

5 posted on 10/13/2009 8:13:50 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 264 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

*shrug* I’ve already told the Israelis how to do the job without leaving a big crater and horrific visuals for the presstitutes to drool over.

DARPA wasn’t interested. *sigh*


6 posted on 10/13/2009 8:16:26 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 264 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

No IAF platform could fly to Iran with that thing. They have
no strategic bombers in their fleet (barring some scratchbuilt effort using a jumbo jet).


7 posted on 10/13/2009 8:19:01 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
Hat tip to SpaceBar:

US giant bunker-buster bomb project rushed since Iran's Qom site discovered

DEBKA scoops AP by weeks...

8 posted on 10/13/2009 8:19:22 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 264 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

The problem with a bomb like this is getting it to the target. They can’t be dropped from a B-1 or B-2 and have to be delivered by a cargo transport, usually a C-130. Not exactly the type of aircraft anyone would want to fly into a well defended enemy airspace.


9 posted on 10/13/2009 8:20:10 AM PDT by Malone LaVeigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

they are no doubt planning to use them on Michigan to get all of those right-wing extremist Militia members who have been out hiding in their underground bunkers since 1998 /sarc


10 posted on 10/13/2009 8:20:31 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Color me shocked if Zero allows this to happen. Shocked!

He won’t do it.


11 posted on 10/13/2009 8:21:00 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
shielded by 10,000 pounds of reinforced concrete.

Wow, that is almost 3 cubic yards. Dolts.

12 posted on 10/13/2009 8:21:15 AM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh
From the link:

The Pentagon has awarded a nearly $52 million contract to speed up placement of the bomb aboard the B-2 Stealth bomber, and officials say the bomb could be fielded as soon as next summer.

It's designed to go in an existing bomber...

13 posted on 10/13/2009 8:23:11 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 264 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Obama is probably targeting his only (perceived) enemy.

Fox News!

14 posted on 10/13/2009 8:23:38 AM PDT by airborne (The Tree of Liberty must, from time to time, be fed with the blood of tyrants and patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

I didn’t know if they could pull it out the back of a heavy transport like the older daisycutters were back in Vietnam.


15 posted on 10/13/2009 8:24:24 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: xone

3 cubic yards. Heck I have more then that in my driveway. I am sure I can get through that with out a BAB (Big A** Bomb)


16 posted on 10/13/2009 8:27:03 AM PDT by DYngbld (I have read the back of the Book and we WIN!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xone

Well, they need a 15,000 lb bomb to destroy 10,000 lbs of concrete..

The reporter needs to check her facts.


17 posted on 10/13/2009 8:35:38 AM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Wondering if there are any water sources near these facilities like dams. If you blow the dams and create a lake over these places that might be a better way to end the usefullness of these facilities.


18 posted on 10/13/2009 8:48:18 AM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
It's designed to go in an existing bomber...

Well, I say let's giddy-up then.

19 posted on 10/13/2009 8:49:58 AM PDT by Malone LaVeigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: null and void

There is no need for bunker busters whatsoever, just nuke the sons o’ bitches and turn Natanz, Qom and Tabriz into craters.

Problem solved.


20 posted on 10/13/2009 8:51:02 AM PDT by mkjessup (Clinton, Bush & 0bama = "See No Evil, Speak No Evil, and *EVIL* ..." (w/apologies to Bob Dole))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson