[Non-Sequitur]

Not sure what you mean. Would you explain?

All that I or anyone else who get's labeled 'troll' around here wants is for the rule of law to be upheld. We don't want the Constitution trampled or the law ignored or legal precedent ignored for the sole purpose of gettng one man. There is no law requiring Obama to produce more documentation than he has, or any documentation at all for that matter. We wish there was but we're not willing to make up laws just to get Obama. There is a strict legal definition for meeting the requirements for filing a suit in civil court. If Taitz and her plaintiffs don't meet them then we don't go around calling the judge treasonous or making up fairy tales about midnight trips by Eric Holder to threaten him. We may not like the way things are going, but we understand why things are the way they are. And we realize that the antics of legal boneheads like Orly Taitz isn't going to accomplish anything.

[pissant]

Obama hasn’t produced any documentation at all to anyone of legal consequence that we know of. Unless you consider the marxists FactCheck and Kos the arbiters of NBC status now.

[Freedom2specul8]

Those darn secretary of states DO play a role in vetting candidates.. And pissant pointed out numerous examples of state requirements on previous threads. SOS-not doing their jobs.

[BuckeyeTexan]

And we realize that the antics of legal boneheads like Orly Taitz isn't going to accomplish anything.

Except to make conservatives look like a bunch of backward, uninformed, uneducated whack jobs. She has to be stopped. This order is a good start. Kudos to Judge Land for making an attempt.

[presently no screen name]

We don't want the Constitution trampled or the law ignored or legal precedent ignored for the sole purpose of gettng one man.

I believe it's already trampled on and continues to be. But you stating 'for the sole purpose of getting ONE MAN' is really downplaying this, IMO, BIG TIME!

There is no law requiring Obama to produce more documentation than he has,

More documention than what? What has he produced that you believe his natural born citizen status has been met according to the Constitution?

We wish there was but we're not willing to make up laws just to get Obama.

Make up new laws? Why? What about following what we already have - The Constitution?

Why are you so convinced about his NB status when BO has spent more than 1M+ to deceive you. Why do his lawyers in CA want this case dismissed? Dismissed for what reason?

We may not like the way things are going, but we understand why things are the way they are.

WHO is 'we'? And what is there to understanding? Do you understand why he is spending $$ to prevent his records that are under lock and key from being exposed?

we realize that the antics of legal boneheads like Orly Taitz isn't going to accomplish anything.

I find it interesting how you consider BO as "ONE MAN" and label an attorney searching for truth a 'bonehead'. Now can you see why you need to defend yourself from being called a troll?

[Ratman83]

NJ allowed Roger Calero on the bellot for president and he is not a NBC so no one checks. That does not make it right.

[American Constitutionalist]

Let's for a minute put aside the issue of " Standing " with those folks who want the Constitutional eligibly qualification upheld.
Let's put aside the problem with standing and what you have said some kind of law that would help the birthers bring a case to court so this issue of Obama's eligibility be addressed.
Would you ( Non - Sequitur ) be willing to be on the " Birthers " side to see if Obama is qualified to be in the office of the President of the USA ?