To: Non-Sequitur
We don't want the Constitution trampled or the law ignored or legal precedent ignored for the sole purpose of gettng one man.
I believe it's already trampled on and continues to be. But you stating 'for the sole purpose of getting ONE MAN' is really downplaying this, IMO, BIG TIME!
There is no law requiring Obama to produce more documentation than he has,
More documention than what? What has he produced that you believe his natural born citizen status has been met according to the Constitution?
We wish there was but we're not willing to make up laws just to get Obama.
Make up new laws? Why? What about following what we already have - The Constitution?
Why are you so convinced about his NB status when BO has spent more than 1M+ to deceive you. Why do his lawyers in CA want this case dismissed? Dismissed for what reason?
We may not like the way things are going, but we understand why things are the way they are.
WHO is 'we'? And what is there to understanding? Do you understand why he is spending $$ to prevent his records that are under lock and key from being exposed?
we realize that the antics of legal boneheads like Orly Taitz isn't going to accomplish anything.
I find it interesting how you consider BO as "ONE MAN" and label an attorney searching for truth a 'bonehead'. Now can you see why you need to defend yourself from being called a troll?
To: presently no screen name; Non-Sequitur
What has he produced that you believe his natural born citizen status has been met according to the Constitution? His publicly released Certification of Live Birth alone is more documentation of his natural born citizen status than was ever publicly provided by Joe Biden, or John McCain, or Sarah Palin, or George W. Bush, or Dick Cheney, or John Kerry, or Al Gore, or Bill Clinton, or Bob Dole, or...
What makes Obama different from all those other Presidential contenders whose citizenship wasn't questioned in the same fashion?
149 posted on
10/13/2009 9:32:36 AM PDT by
LorenC
To: presently no screen name
To: presently no screen name; Non-Sequitur
320 posted on
10/13/2009 11:21:41 AM PDT by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: presently no screen name
I believe it's already trampled on and continues to be. But you stating 'for the sole purpose of getting ONE MAN' is really downplaying this, IMO, BIG TIME! So if you trample on it in return then where are you any better than he?
More documention than what? What has he produced that you believe his natural born citizen status has been met according to the Constitution?
What law outlines what he's required to provide? And who he must provide it to?
Make up new laws? Why? What about following what we already have - The Constitution?
How has he violated it. The Constitution says the president must be a natural-born citizen. Obama says he is. Case closed, right?
Why are you so convinced about his NB status when BO has spent more than 1M+ to deceive you.
What law or clause in the Constitution says that I personally must be convinced of his status?
Why do his lawyers in CA want this case dismissed? Dismissed for what reason?
Lack of jurisdiction. Lack of standing. And a couple of other reasons. It's right there in the motion to dismiss.
WHO is 'we'? And what is there to understanding?
Rational people. And understand how the law works and what the Constitution says.
I find it interesting how you consider BO as "ONE MAN" and label an attorney searching for truth a 'bonehead'.
I find it interesting that you can look at Orly's antics and not conclude she's a bonehead.
Now can you see why you need to defend yourself from being called a troll?
I have never felt the need to defend myself from Birther name-calling. I just consider the source.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson