No, that's not right. Look let's just address some basic things straight up, without sniping and accusations of bad faith. Maybe we just might get to a point where each side can understand the other's honestly, without assuming evil intent.
So in simple terms, you understand that any President could be 35, be a natural born citizen, and have lived in the US for 14 years. That those facts can be true facts, even if he shows nobody anything to prove them. They can still be true facts of themselves. Right?
A fact is not a fact until it is confirmed. Having it in your mind or saying it is true does not make it a fact. Showing to other observers who see the same thing makes it a fact. If you say you are 35 that is not a fact until it can be shown in some manner to be factual.
How odd that someone on a web site on which politicans are grilled every day would accept Nancy Pelosi and Howard Dean's comments that OB is in fact qualified to be president. In fact, the facts are being questioned, are they not. The facts are known and the proof is out there (apologies to X-Files) but his comments may not be factual. In fact, it is my stronge desire to one day know the actual facts by having recognized authority review his personal records. Until then the facts remain unknown.