Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are Obama advisers downplaying Afghan dangers?
McClatchy ^ | October 11, 2009 | Jonathan S. Landay, John Walcott and Nancy A. Youssef

Posted on 10/12/2009 7:18:01 PM PDT by Ooh-Ah

WASHINGTON -- As the Obama administration reconsiders its Afghanistan policy, White House officials are minimizing warnings from the intelligence community, the military and the State Department about the risks of adopting a limited strategy focused on al Qaida, U.S. intelligence, diplomatic and military officials told McClatchy.

Recent U.S. intelligence assessments have found that the Taliban and other Pakistan-based groups that are fighting U.S.-led forces have much closer ties to al Qaida now than they did before 9/11, would allow the terrorist network to re-establish bases in Afghanistan and would help Osama bin Laden export his radical brand of Islam to Afghanistan's neighbors and beyond, the officials said.

McClatchy interviewed more than 15 senior and mid-level U.S. intelligence, military and diplomatic officials, all of whom said they concurred with the assessments. All of them requested anonymity because the assessments are classified and the officials weren't authorized to speak publicly.

The officials said the White House is searching for an alternative to the broader counterinsurgency strategy favored by Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the U.S. military commander in Afghanistan, and Gen. David Petraeus, the head of the U.S. Central Command.

...

The intelligence assessments based their conclusions that the Taliban and related groups would back al Qaida's global agenda on the fact that the Afghan insurgents not only continue to admire bin Laden and his Arab, Central Asian and other followers, but also are indebted to them for financial, military and technical assistance.

Moreover, the Taliban and allied groups are also indebted to the jihadists in the Middle East who've helped fund their insurgency, and they remain wedded to Pashtunwali, the centuries-old Pashtun tribal code that mandates protection of fellow Muslims.

(Excerpt) Read more at mcclatchydc.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; downplaying; nationalsecurity; nationalsecurityfail; nsp; nss; obama; whitehouse

1 posted on 10/12/2009 7:18:03 PM PDT by Ooh-Ah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Simply stated, the jOker is going to surrender in Afghanistan so that he can funnel ALL military dollars into his precious DeathCare.


2 posted on 10/12/2009 7:19:56 PM PDT by kromike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Ya think?


3 posted on 10/12/2009 7:23:23 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
Pervez Musharraf says the main threat is Taliban not Al Qaeda, and that Obama's proposed strategy of retreat will be catastrophic. I tned to give him somewhat more cred than Obama's collection of thugs and perverts.
4 posted on 10/12/2009 7:28:19 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard (Truth--The liberal's Kryptonite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=33724


5 posted on 10/12/2009 7:50:50 PM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=33855


6 posted on 10/12/2009 7:52:31 PM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=33828


7 posted on 10/12/2009 7:53:53 PM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kromike

Why doesn’t he just appoint an Afghan Czar?


8 posted on 10/12/2009 7:59:49 PM PDT by RepublicanMeansAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

During his term (hopefully his only term), The Messiah will get the U.S. involved in Somalia in a war which will never end. That’s his ticket to cranking up the military industrial complex and producing enough money to pay down some of the debt he has racked up. This will be the “just” war.

By comparison, Somalia will make Afghanistan look like kids scuffling in a sand box.


9 posted on 10/12/2009 8:21:02 PM PDT by Rembrandt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
Moreover, the Taliban and allied groups are also indebted to the jihadists in the Middle East who've helped fund their insurgency, and they remain wedded to Pashtunwali, the centuries-old Pashtun tribal code that mandates protection of fellow Muslims.

What has Obama have to offer them in exchange?

10 posted on 10/12/2009 8:36:26 PM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE HOMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Obama has yet to publish a National Security Strategy. He is required to by the Goldwater-Nichols act.

He is leaving the US Military rudderless.


11 posted on 10/12/2009 8:39:40 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (A mob of one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ae_U7shNNKI

Conspiracy???


12 posted on 10/12/2009 8:51:15 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

And now the pig is putting lipstick on the WOT.


13 posted on 10/12/2009 10:23:09 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

Why Somalia?


14 posted on 10/13/2009 1:12:50 AM PDT by riri (http://rationaljingo.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: riri

“Why Somalia?”

It’s newsworthy, particularly with liberals, and will get The Messiah’s picture on the camera again and again. He’s a media hound and cares bupkus about any consequences.


15 posted on 10/14/2009 9:29:35 PM PDT by Rembrandt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson