Very good analogy.......the Bush admin had a LEGITIMATE reason to perceive CBS “News” as the enemy. Fake but accurate, my a$$.
I believe he was on with Cavuto and he still says the story about W is true. Sheesh!
bump for later
Leftists do not agree - they feel that they are entitled to the same opinion towards the Press AND that it is different than your analogy because they are standing against evil.
So if they “fight” a New Network on that basis then you comparison is of no validity.
Forget any idea of logic, these responses by 0bama and his cohorts prove that he is a divisionist partisan to the core and NO thought will ever be considered for any kind of compromise for those who do not agree with his radical leftism.
When he claimed all of that “healing the country” oratory it is vert well likely that he meant that his plan was to eliminate the cancer (Conservatives) so that would bring America together.
GWB was too stupid to have a counter-media strategy. The only thing they did was put Cheney on talk radio. This got out the base in 2004.
But you are right, this direct attack approach would have been attacked from all media, esp once GWB was unpopular.
You still have an “ Obama” in there
but you had me going for a while
If only. What could have been.......
*
Is this satire? I see Obama’s name in the middle of the story?
What is your agenda. You signed up on Jan 22,2009.
Let’s see which office do you have basement or do you actually get a window. Just wondering.
Your problem is that issueing an opinion. Versus the Zero WH actually spending taxpayer money harrassing their “enemies”. You see what the Zero WH is doing can get Zero IMPEACHED. Just like what Nixon was headed for if he hadn’t resigned.
Ask HILLARY, she was working as one of the Staffers on the committee to impeach Nixon.
Don’t think that the questioning of the DAN RATHER dellusional news is even close to what Zero’s WH minions are up to.