Posted on 10/11/2009 10:02:29 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
This is outrageous. I believe we really are experiencing a bloodless coup.
Our representatives need to be forced to ask questions about Obama's Social Security fraud recorded in this affadavit dated September 30, 2009.
Look at the document at the link.
I suspect you are right. Conservative sites may occasionally be hacked with malware, but they are also listed as "dangerous" sites.
That was the case with Orly Taitz's site, where many Freepers complained of a notice by Google that it was a dangerous site. But google seems to work hand in glove with Obama, so it's not unlikely that they did that for political reasons. I didn't see the warning, possibly because I use google search as my default but do not use google toolbar to search with.
I think Obama has put out a lot of orders for his flunkies to do anything they can to sink the "birther" issue, and that includes blacklisting these sites with danger warnings.
Well, what do we expect from a community organizer with ties to ACORN?!
I got nothing. Scribd is a virus free site by definition
It hosts documents in a format that cannot infect your computer
Perhaps if you downloaded one of their documents it could infect but I doubt that too
So true, kcvl, so true.
You obviously don't watch enough TV - CSI to know that fake identities are built on the ss numbers OF DEAD PEOPLE.
I got mine when I went to work for my father plastering when I was 14. He got his in 1935 when he was 33.
It says 30 September 2009. The OH is for Ohio.
Absolutely and thank you all for the information. I'm going to do a "thorough" search & cleansing on my PC this evening. Think I will upgrade Norton as well; information here has really directed me. Thx again
True, Nimrod, but people who WERE BORN IN 1890 did get social security numbers when social security was enacted!
I know you are totally against Orly and probably against conservatism, but try to temper your hate with some sort of thought and reasoning process!
What exactly are you implying?
Siap but that only means the person was born then and issued the number when the system was instigated.
But people born in around 1890 did get SSN's. My grandparents for example. They just didn't get them at birth, like is done now. For that matter, I did not get one until I was around 18. They would have gotten theirs about the time the program started, in the 1930s, when they would have been around 40.
Using McAfee is like having no protection at all, in my opinion.
So ACORN helps people get SSANs, too?
Of course, it couldn't possibly be that she made a mistake in "locating" this SSN for BO, could it?
I don’t have a criminal mind, so . . .
Why would Obama want/need a SS# that wasn’t his?
He’d never be able to draw benefits from any earning reported under a false SS#. Does this imply that he needed it for reasons of identity? Wouldn’t this be short-lived?
Help me out here.
The mathematically worst possible case, I guess, is:
In this scenario you need 600M SS#'s out of 1B, which does not yet require reuse of numbers. Even if the assumed life length is not 85 years it won't make much of a difference. But at some later time the SS# will have to be reused; most likely, though, the new SS# number format will be introduced (if we still have SS# and the country by then.) The reason for new numbers is obvious - the totalitarian state of the future will not permit any uncertainty about identity of its subjects.
The nine-digit SSN is composed of three parts:
* The first set of three digits is called the Area Number
* The second set of two digits is called the Group Number
* The final set of four digits is the Serial Number
Area numbers are assigned by state where issued, or now by the zip code of the address the card is to be sent to, since the cards are now centrally issued. So modern ones are really tied to the state of residence, whereas before one go to an SS office in any state, not just the one where one lived.
The Group numbers are just for ease of filing in the pre-computer days, so in a way are just a oddly determined of part of the serial number.
I’m surprised that there haven’t been riots yet to get this fraud and his ugly racist wife out of the white house.
This man Barack Hussein Obama is not who he claims to be... God help this nation....
Please get your legislature in your state to push for the Secretary of State to properly vet “EVERY” candidate.
Yes, this is a tad bit late with the Kenyan in the White House, but the people have to take control of this through each state before the next election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.