Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Solar power outshining Colorado's gas industry
yahoo - Associated Press ^ | Sat Oct 10, 7:45 pm ET | By DINA CAPPIELLO,

Posted on 10/11/2009 6:58:15 AM PDT by slag

DURANGO, Colo. – The sun had just crested the distant ridge of the Rocky Mountains, but already it was producing enough power for the electric meter on the side of the Smiley Building to spin backward.

For the Shaw brothers, who converted the downtown arts building and community center into a miniature solar power plant two years ago, each reverse rotation subtracts from their monthly electric bill. It also means the building at that moment is producing more electricity from the sun than it needs.

The higher fossil-fuel prices that could come with climate legislation would make it more competitive.

"You can't drive an industry on people doing the right thing. The best thing for this country is if gas were $10 a gallon," said Shaw

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: solarpower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
"You can't drive an industry on people doing the right thing. The best thing for this country is if gas were $10 a gallon," said Shaw

Unbelievable!

1 posted on 10/11/2009 6:58:15 AM PDT by slag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: slag
"You can't drive an industry on people doing the right thing. The best thing for this country is if gas were $10 a gallon," said Shaw

The next best thing to serfdom where the peasents were tied to the land and not allowed to move away from it.

$10/gallon wouldn't even phase Al Gore and his jetting around to climate change conferences.

2 posted on 10/11/2009 7:01:50 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Soon everyone will win a Nobel Peace Prize for not being George Bush...well, except for George Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slag

community center!! I stopped there.


3 posted on 10/11/2009 7:05:56 AM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slag
I guess we can assume that this guy now realizes that he has over paid for his bright idea and is POd, it will probably never even break even.
4 posted on 10/11/2009 7:06:02 AM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slag

One can only assume that Mr. Shaw doesn’t have to worry about paying for $10 gas. How nice for him! I’m just wondering if Mr. Shaw has thought about the foul brews and products involved in creating his solar cells? How will he dispose of them when they quit working? Or is that also a problem for someone else to deal with?


5 posted on 10/11/2009 7:07:36 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slag
The private residence, nestled in a remote canyon, probably will produce more power from the sun than it will use, causing its meter to spin in reverse like the Smiley Building's. The cost, however, is steep: more than $500,000.

Seems cheap and cost effective.\s

6 posted on 10/11/2009 7:09:00 AM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slag

What a load! The payback never happens. But Tax Ritter loves this “new green economy” crap.


7 posted on 10/11/2009 7:10:52 AM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slag

Keep up the good work; maybe you can reverse GW so that Colorado gets snow by mid September.


8 posted on 10/11/2009 7:11:05 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (No to Crap -n- Trade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat

There are cost-effective uses for solar/wind setups in remote locations. If the distance from the grid is significant, a solar/wind setup can be cheaper than getting connected.


9 posted on 10/11/2009 7:12:32 AM PDT by Squawk 8888 (TSA and DHS are jobs programs for people who are not smart enough to flip burgers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: slag

This is what happens when economic retards are in charge of public policy.

The article fails to mention that the “solar power” energy rebate given to those who “turn their meters backward” exist as an almost 100% pure subsidy. The grid actually receives almost no benefit from the “solar power” which is actually calculated as “demand” rather than “supply” when the utility projects it’s power needs.

“Why?” one might ask.

Fairly simple.

When a cloud passes over, the “solar power” can drop to almost 0, so conventional generation capacity has to be running on “standby” to handle the “demand”. The result, almost no savings in either capital requirements, or emissions.

But “green enthusiasts” are confidant that technologies will eventually be invented to cure this “minor flaw”.


10 posted on 10/11/2009 7:15:01 AM PDT by crescen7 (game on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888
“There are cost-effective uses for solar/wind setups in remote locations. If the distance from the grid is significant, a solar/wind setup can be cheaper than getting connected.”

Yes I understand that but a Half Mill will also buy a nice generator and fuel for years.

11 posted on 10/11/2009 7:15:29 AM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: slag

This whole solar, windmill ethanol green alternative business exists solely because of government subsidy. So on a sunny day it is possible for a short time for this building to generate its electric needs with a little surplus. Obviously other power sources are still needed at night and on cloudy days. If one considers the cost of installing this solar system versus the actual electricity it generates the price per kilowatt would be astronomical and I am certain would not offset more than a fraction of the total electric needs for this building.


12 posted on 10/11/2009 7:18:44 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slag
The sun had just crested the distant ridge of the Rocky Mountains, but already it was producing enough power for the electric meter on the side of the Smiley Building to spin backward.

Then, the air conditioner starts up and consumes 40 times the energy derived from the sun... all day and into the night!


13 posted on 10/11/2009 7:19:32 AM PDT by WVKayaker (Click it or Ticket!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat
Stale foot odor, Radon gas, blah blah no AC, Heat, or hand dryers!
No HAND DRYERS to save the forest! /GASP
14 posted on 10/11/2009 7:23:51 AM PDT by MaxMax (Obama can't play in the Olympic reindeer games)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: slag
What he said; The best thing for this country is if gas were $10 a gallon,"

What he was thinking:

The best thing for me is to keep getting these highly profitable government subsidies and special projects even if it costs the ordinary sucker $10.00 a gallon for gas.

15 posted on 10/11/2009 7:30:11 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slag
"You can't drive an industry on people doing the right thing. The best thing for this country me is if gas were $10 a gallon," said Shaw

There -- fixed it for the selfish trough slurper.

16 posted on 10/11/2009 7:30:32 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slag
The best thing for this country is if gas were $10 a gallon," said Shaw

Durango is a small town of 15,000 on the edge of Colorado. When residents need something the town can't provide, they have to go to Farmington, NM (1 hour) or Albuquerque (5 hours), or sometimes Denver (7 hours). Plus, Durango is a tourist town which relies on people driving to Durango from all over. In other words, Durango would be destroyed by $10 gas.

With a long enough lead time , it could convert to natural gas cars though, which is plentiful in the area.

17 posted on 10/11/2009 7:31:33 AM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

Just imagine what $10 gas would do to the costs of goods and services in this country? This idiot needs to take Economics 101.


18 posted on 10/11/2009 7:37:12 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: slag
"...The best thing for this country is if gas were $10 a gallon,"

Typical liberal. This is Thomas Sowell's "single level thinking" again. The liberal thinks the only thing that would happen with $10 gas is that people that drive excessively will pay. He forgets the price of everything brought into his town would skyrocket in cost due to transportation cost....

hh
19 posted on 10/11/2009 7:47:39 AM PDT by hoosier hick (Note to RINOs: We need a choice, not an echo....Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slag

Was this before or after the light sensors were snowed under?


20 posted on 10/11/2009 7:50:01 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson