You can “insult” me all you want; however, where are all the millions of the evolutionary fossils? You know, all the “mistakes”, the fossils w/ 5 limbs or 1 eye, or 3 ears, etc?
Where did they all go?? Why on earth do we continue to find fossils already “evolutioned”??? Where are all the “inbetweens”??
You can insult me all you want; however, where are all the millions of the evolutionary fossils? You know, all the mistakes, the fossils w/ 5 limbs or 1 eye, or 3 ears, etc?
Huh? Say what? Your biology teacher did you a huge disservice by teaching you that you should expect "fossils with 5 limbs or 1 eye or 3 ears, etc." For he (and now you, apparently) have a very poor understanding of evolution and natural history.
Such grotesque life forms would have been aberrations and by your description, most likely would not have resulted in a viable lineage. Therefore, no species succeeded with such aberrations and as a result, fossils of such creatures would be hard to come by indeed. And, it goes without saying, they'd hardly result in a viable species.
Of course, getting back to the topic of the article... Why does this guy exist at all? Where is he today? By creationist logic, it's not that "it's just an ape," but should be, "Hey! This thing shouldn't exist at all!"
Why on earth do we continue to find fossils already evolutioned??? Where are all the inbetweens??
Oh dear. You really are looking for "crocoducks" and such. I hate to disappoint you, but evolution doesn't result in macabre wacky animals (platypus notwithstanding.) What defines an "in between" to you? Would snakes with legs (we have them)? Lizards with feathers (them too)?
Please explain the tiktaalik from your perspective.