Okay, to recap:
You asked where the transitional fossils are.
I asked you to describe what a transitional fossil would look like, so we’d know what we were looking for.
You said that meant I didn’t have any proof.
I pointed out that you hadn’t yet said what “proof” would look like, and asked again.
And now you refer me to a post that links to a TalkOrigins FAQ about transitional vertebrate fossils. Does this mean you accept that all the fossils described in the FAQ are in fact transitionals, and so you withdraw your question? If not, what’s you point?
Are you sure you’re up to an FR crevo thread?