Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US feels Taliban poses lesser threat than al-Qaeda
Press Trust of India ^ | 9 Oct 2009, 02:0 HRS IST | no byline

Posted on 10/09/2009 1:32:43 PM PDT by a fool in paradise

United States feels that Taliban poses a lesser threat to American security than al-Qaeda, the White House said here today, as media reported that the Obama administration has concluded that Taliban cannot be eliminated in Afghanistan.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs sought to make a clear differentiation between Taliban and al-Qaeda as he said al-Qaeda was an "entity that, through a global jihadist network would seek to strike the US homeland".

"I think the Taliban are, obviously, exceedingly bad people that have done awful things," Gibbs said. "Their capability is somewhat different, though, on that continuum of transnational threats," he added.

Gibbs remarks comes as Obama is intensely engaged in a intense Afghan policy review and raise speculations that the US President might not opt for increasing US troops in the war-torn country.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; afghanwar; appeasement; familyguy; obama; proterrorist; robertgibbs; taliban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: r9etb

“To now pretend that they’re (Al Queerda and the Taliscum) separable is like suggesting that the Wermacht posed a lesser threat than the Nazi Party.”

That’s what happens when stupid-ass, sh#t-scared, white liberal-guilt ridden losers elect a racist, treasonous, closet homosexual, testosterone-deficient, drug using POS teleprompter, married to a GD cobra-looking, ugly-ass biatch.


21 posted on 10/09/2009 2:49:18 PM PDT by Levante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

He’s a fool if he thinks it’s not all interconnected.

But...then...we already knew that!


22 posted on 10/09/2009 2:49:21 PM PDT by luvie (2010 is Conservatives' to win....or lose. So....LET'S WIN!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
“Deadly Attack By Taliban Tests New Strategy”

“The attack began in the early morning hours. Taliban-linked militiamen struck from the high ground using rifles, grenades and rockets against the outpost, a cluster of stone buildings set in a small Hindu Kush valley that has been manned by 140 U.S. and Afghan forces. By the end of a day-long siege, eight Americans and two Afghan security officers were dead, marking the highest toll for U.S. forces in over a year.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/04/AR2009100400778.html?hpid=topnews

Yep, no threat. /sarc

23 posted on 10/09/2009 3:01:47 PM PDT by tobyhill (The Communist has arrived)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LUV W

Oh, absolutely. But the threat they pose to the Afghani women is irrelevent in this context. The Taliban aren’t the only gang of murderous tyrants in the world, or by any means the most successful. There are plenty around the world who are just as bad if not worse who are actually fully in charge of their own particular backward, hellhole nations.
The threat posed by the Taliban is seperate to their domestic asshattery. As many in the top brass of the British and American militaries have stated, allowing the Taliban to win this war would have an electric effect upon muslim fanatics everywhere for having taken on and beaten the world’s only superpower and its allies in an armed confrontation, and the threat posed by the likes of Al Quaeda will magnify in size and become even harder or even impossible to subdue....


24 posted on 10/09/2009 3:30:20 PM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

You are absolutely correct. I was just finding the lowest
denominator in their level of threat. If nothing else happens, the region will revert back to the days of terror and misery to their very people, much less the impact that a loss has on our standing in that region.


25 posted on 10/09/2009 3:42:34 PM PDT by luvie (2010 is Conservatives' to win....or lose. So....LET'S WIN!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Is it a secret or are you going to share?


26 posted on 10/09/2009 3:50:28 PM PDT by Canedawg (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

To what....”NUTS” Inc.?


27 posted on 10/09/2009 3:58:53 PM PDT by luvie (2010 is Conservatives' to win....or lose. So....LET'S WIN!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...

The list, ping


28 posted on 10/09/2009 5:10:55 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: benjibrowder

They probably know that, but it’s politically expedient to ignore it. Ostammer will crawl into bed with the Taliban in order to bring an end to the war in Afghanistan. They’ll be back in full control six months thereafter. All our efforts, soldiers killed and maimed and money spent will have been for NOTHING.

But I expected exactly that from ostammer and his administration. They don’t want money spent on national security. They want to spend it for entitlements to buy votes with.


29 posted on 10/09/2009 5:13:17 PM PDT by bustinchops (Teddy ("The Hiccup") Kennedy - the original water-boarder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

The Taliban is a regional entity and al-Qaeda is an international entity. The Taliban may support al-Qaeda, but their aims are quite different. The Taliban harbored al-Qaeda, certainly, and deserved to suffer the consequences of that. But they are NOT the same thing. We could live very easily in a world with the Taleban ruling Afghanistan (although NOT Pakistan), as they did before 9/11. We cannot live very easily with al-Qaeda as a working entity plotting international terrorist attacks. We must differentiate between these two if we wish to work in the interests of US security.


30 posted on 10/09/2009 5:20:12 PM PDT by GoldwatersGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Wow, I feel reassured now. Knowing that the Taliban is less of a threat than Al-Qaeda was probably what tipped the scale in favor of Obama winning that ridiculous Nobel peace prize. LOL.


31 posted on 10/09/2009 8:18:36 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg

They changed it months ago, Glenn talked about it.


32 posted on 10/10/2009 5:47:06 AM PDT by stockpirate ("if my thought-dreams could be seen. They'd probably put my head in a guillotine" Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GoldwatersGhost

Can we with live with Hitler’s Nazi Party ruling Germany so long as we can get him to honor his pacts with Mother Russia, Italy, and even the French?

I mean, we can have SANCTIONS on him to keep him from expanding his military and because of the ways he treats Jews, Gypsies, Poles, Catholics, Protestants, and those who disagree with his politics. But we can “co-exist” with intolerant radical supremacist ideologies holding top political office of an entire nation, no? < /sarc >

PS Pakistan has nukes.


33 posted on 10/12/2009 8:08:56 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson