Skip to comments.
Washington Times: DOJ denies existence of a "blog squad"
Washington Times ^
| 10/8/09
| Kerry Picket
Posted on 10/08/2009 12:04:19 PM PDT by mudblood
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Also, the Washington Examiner mentioned this story: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/Thank-you_-Wolf-Blitzer-8354597-63675277.html
1
posted on
10/08/2009 12:04:20 PM PDT
by
mudblood
To: GOPJ
2
posted on
10/08/2009 12:05:34 PM PDT
by
mudblood
To: mudblood
3
posted on
10/08/2009 12:05:35 PM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: mudblood
DOJ denial confirms its existence.
4
posted on
10/08/2009 12:09:11 PM PDT
by
Dapper 26
To: mudblood
a conservative site that i have been visiting that blogs about counter-intelligence, posted a couple days ago about a “new” browser that visited his site. he briefly described it.
wouldn’t surprise me if THAT was the OBAMA administration and NOT the TALIBAN.
5
posted on
10/08/2009 12:12:30 PM PDT
by
machogirl
(First they came for my tagline.)
To: 444Flyer; MestaMachine; STARWISE; LucyT; bamahead
No doj blog squad!! YaY!
Okay...I believe them because they said so.
6
posted on
10/08/2009 12:14:51 PM PDT
by
Freedom2specul8
(I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
To: machogirl
Pretty interesting, and possible. But more likely its a spook, or someone who wrote their own browser (not hard, actually, to make a html-rendering engine). But if it is something sneaky and new, they wouldn’t give it to an idiot like Russo to use. If so, it wouldn’t be a secret for too long.
7
posted on
10/08/2009 12:15:08 PM PDT
by
mudblood
To: mudblood
These “squads” simply do not exist.
Pay no attention to these bogus news stories.
All is well, my friends.
To: aSimpleCitizen
aSimpleCitizen
Since 2009-10-08
Do you work for the DOJ?
9
posted on
10/08/2009 12:20:56 PM PDT
by
numberonepal
(Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
To: aSimpleCitizen
I bet they all have SEIU shirts on.
10
posted on
10/08/2009 12:21:22 PM PDT
by
Califreak
(If it's Astroturf, why are you trying to mow it?(sign seen at a town hall meeting))
To: numberonepal
Good one! I was wondering whrn they owuld show up here. ;)
BTW, this administration is as paranoid as Nixon’s.
11
posted on
10/08/2009 12:23:09 PM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: mudblood
good point. they’d give to the enemy combatants.
12
posted on
10/08/2009 12:24:29 PM PDT
by
machogirl
(First they came for my tagline.)
To: BunnySlippers
Good one! I was wondering whrn they owuld show up here. ;)The freakin' morons think we're as stupid as they are. And they're almost all hit 'n run morons at that. Cowards, commies, sissies, and intellectual lightweights aren't even worth our time.
13
posted on
10/08/2009 12:30:45 PM PDT
by
numberonepal
(Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; 444Flyer
Like we ain’t on them like hound kitties. Three down in two days. And it’s early.
14
posted on
10/08/2009 12:31:16 PM PDT
by
MestaMachine
(One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
To: BunnySlippers
“BTW, this administration is as paranoid as Nixons.”
Yeah, but Nixon would have liked us.
15
posted on
10/08/2009 12:33:28 PM PDT
by
MestaMachine
(One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
To: numberonepal
Me?
Work for the DOJ?
No way.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; rxsid; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; GOPJ; ..
.... C'mon, would anyone in DC lie to We The People? Seriously? After all, We The People pay their salaries.
17
posted on
10/08/2009 12:46:12 PM PDT
by
LucyT
To: mudblood
Nonsense.
Admin Moderator does not need a “squad”...
18
posted on
10/08/2009 12:49:16 PM PDT
by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts....)
To: numberonepal
Has to be a freeper in disguise! :)
19
posted on
10/08/2009 12:51:40 PM PDT
by
Freedom2specul8
(I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
To: mudblood
"There is no 'blog squad'. There is Tracy [Russo] who handles online media. Its the policy of the office of public affairs to not post anonymous comments. We have not seen any evidence that anyone does post comments, and if we did have evidence of that, people would no longer work here." Sounds like bureaucratese for: our policy is not to post anonymous comments - we suspect it's happened but there's NO evidence ( and no one should show me any) But from this point forward - if it happens, you'll be fired.
That's good news - they're on record saying they won't do this - it'll be political suicide if they get caught tweaking political blogs...
As to Tracy Russo - I wonder how many "posts" in the net are in her name... especially since she doesn't post anonymously.
20
posted on
10/08/2009 12:53:21 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(MSM BIAS: grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome. George Orwell)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson