Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

I’m no scholar - but if its in the constitution, how can it be unconstitutional? If the constitution bans gay marriage - isn’t gay marriage unconstitutional.


8 posted on 10/03/2009 7:25:23 AM PDT by CrazyJoeDivola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: CrazyJoeDivola
I’m no scholar - but if its in the constitution, how can it be unconstitutional? If the constitution bans gay marriage - isn’t gay marriage unconstitutional.

That's just it - she shouldn't. This is a state judge, not a federal judge. She's governed by the state constitution and that bans same sex marriages. Her decision should be rapidly overturned.

11 posted on 10/03/2009 7:36:34 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: CrazyJoeDivola

It’s a STATE constitutional amendment. The judge is claiming that amendment violates the FEDERAL constitutional guarantee of equal protection under law.

This is what makes it so dangerous...as all it would take is a federal judge to agree with her...(and the Supremes to duck the issue) and it becomes de facto law in every state.

Which is why McCain et al. are so foolish to avoid a federal constitutional amendment to protect marriage.


24 posted on 10/03/2009 8:38:54 AM PDT by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: CrazyJoeDivola
but if its in the constitution, how can it be unconstitutional?

Simple. What's in the constitution is unconstitutional.

35 posted on 10/03/2009 1:49:04 PM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson