Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sonofstrangelove
India's 1998 demonstration of thermonuclear capability -- fission-based bombs with a force of 100 kilotons or more...

Doesn't 'thermonuclear' refer to fusion?
6 posted on 10/02/2009 9:32:34 PM PDT by posterchild (Endowed by my Creator with certain unalienable rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: posterchild

You are correct.It is a fusion of the atomic nucleus at very high teperatures.


7 posted on 10/02/2009 9:34:36 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: posterchild
The article is technically correct while being scientifically misleading (as almost always happens in the political press.)

A thermonuclear weapon is an H-Bomb. This is a bomb "based" on a fission because the first reaction in a thermonuclear weapon is a fission reaction. The fission reaches sufficiently high temperature under containment to attain neutronic fusion of hydrogen isotopes (as opposed to the aneutronic fusion, which [luckily] occurs in the sun.) The energy released in the secondary fusion is used to irradiate a third stage of depleted uranium or some other non-fissile material which then becomes fissionable, goes critical, and detonates. The third stage absorbs enough energy from the fusion to allow a highly efficient fission. It is believed only around 1/3 of the energy actually comes from the fusion proper -- but none of the high yield would be possible without fusion.

Exact details are, of course, highly classified. But roughly, if you leave off the tertiary fission-fusion-fission to just get a fission-fusion device, the fast neutrons escape and you have a neutron bomb.

Interestingly, the design of a thermonuclear weapons involves very high technology and sophisticated physics and engineering design. By contrast, a nuclear weapon is in a sense a trivial exercise in physics but a very sophisticated effort in metallurgy, refining, and materials handling: once you've got enough uranium or plutonium, things take care of themselves. This is a huge oversimplification -- especially in terms of weapons efficiency -- but gives you some idea why this man's claims may be true: that India has nuclear weapons but has never really detonated an H-Bomb. H-Bomb design requires a LOT of testing. One US test was a "dud". A few Russian efforts are believed to have been in some early cases publicity stunts that probably failed (or partially failed.)

12 posted on 10/02/2009 10:01:14 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47. In leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: posterchild

Yes. Their mistake may have been using just one fission trigger, instead of multiple.


27 posted on 10/03/2009 5:19:32 AM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: posterchild

A thermonuke is none other than a hydrogen bomb

a bomb whose violent explosive power is due to the sudden release of atomic energy resulting from the fusion of light nuclei (as of hydrogen atoms) at very high temperature and pressure to form helium nuclei (webster)


38 posted on 10/03/2009 11:29:31 AM PDT by omega4179 (pos approval rating -11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson