Women tried to bring attention to rape as a serious crime for decades. So they changed their tactic. They argued that rape is a violent crime, not a crime about sex, but violence.
So now- apologists try to distinguish a difference between one rape from another rape. In their minds, if the victim was not threatened by a knife or gun, or beat up, etc- then it is not violent, not “really a rape”
I would love to hear Whoopi call Oprah and tell Oprah that her child rape wasn’t really a rape...I mean if the victim in this case was some Hollywood elitist and the rapist were some rich Republican that fled for thirty years, there would be an entirely different tone.....
these people are just flat our sick....their world view is beyond screwed, it is outright hypocritical narcisistic..
So, in their world (LibLand), drugging someone and then raping them is OK, as long as there's no violence involved. Sheesh!
I would love to hear Whoopi call Oprah and tell Oprah that her child rape wasn’t really a rape.
Are you saying that Oprah was raped? I had heard she was molested (I'm never sure what that really means - it somehow sounds less serious than rape), and that she became promiscuous as a result. If Oprah denounces Polanski, here's where Oprah can do some real good. I wonder if she will. Like her or not, she's got a lot of influence.
Interesting take.
And I’m not 1 who thinks it’s really about “power” and anger at women, anyway. If it were, why not just beat the woman senseless?