Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

83% Say Congress Should Post Bills Online For All To Read Before Voting On Them
Rasmussen ^ | Sep 30, 2009

Posted on 09/30/2009 9:09:54 AM PDT by BAW

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Can you hear us now?
1 posted on 09/30/2009 9:09:55 AM PDT by BAW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BAW

Who would pay for it? That would be a huge undertaking because you can’t just throw the word perfect copy on the web...it would have to PDF at least. Sometimes people are just not reasonable or have any realistic understanding of life in the real world.


2 posted on 09/30/2009 9:12:45 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BAW
Yeah, well screw your 83%! --Nancy Pelosi
3 posted on 09/30/2009 9:13:06 AM PDT by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BAW

The other 17% are the unions, Congress, Senate and the administration...


4 posted on 09/30/2009 9:13:28 AM PDT by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BAW

Someday, Americans are going to take their government back. I think that process has already begun. That’s a good thing.


5 posted on 09/30/2009 9:15:49 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (I don't remember Americans being called "racists" when we fought against Hillarycare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BAW

How awful!

Can you imagine the ignorant, knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing hoi-poloi actually looking over the shoulders of their SERVANTS, the Congress, as the Congress considers new ways to “harass the people and eat out their substance” and constrain their liberties?

How presumptious of those ignorant peasants!

By the way, we should INSIST that these bills be written in PLAIN LANGUAGE that is easily understood.

Like our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution!


6 posted on 09/30/2009 9:16:59 AM PDT by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Sounds to me as if it could be a part on a new “Contract For America.”


7 posted on 09/30/2009 9:19:17 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BAW

Any member of Congress that claims not read or understand a bill before voting on it doesn’t deserve the office. Making the bill public will give the people added power to hold their members of Congress accountable.


8 posted on 09/30/2009 9:20:07 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
-- Who would pay for it? That would be a huge undertaking because you can’t just throw the word perfect copy on the web...it would have to PDF at least. --

All the material is posted already, in other words, we are already paying for it. It comes in plaintext, for the most pat, but also pdf (See Congressional record - all bills are published).

The only difference under discussion here is timing. Should the text be available to the public before the body votes on the language? It is typical for "hot" topics, to have the text available to the public, the day AFTER the vote is taken.

9 posted on 09/30/2009 9:20:53 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
That would be a huge undertaking because you can’t just throw the word perfect copy on the web...it would have to PDF at least.

I highly doubt that the bills are actually typed out on a typewriter anymore, to convert to a PDF only take a minute or so. I work in printing and havent seen hardcopy originals for the past 5-7 years.
10 posted on 09/30/2009 9:24:03 AM PDT by boxerblues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

If it would impede their ability to push through bad legislation, I’m all for it. If they can’t figure out how to convert to pdf, too bad.


11 posted on 09/30/2009 9:27:46 AM PDT by knittnmom ("...only dead fish 'go with the flow'". - Sarah Palin 7/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Who would pay for it? We all pay for it. Let's see. When I want a PDF on my Mac, I just tell it I want a PDF instead of paper. I assume MS has the same feature by now.

Let's say it cost a million dollars to publish it on the web.

Let's say the proposal is for $1.3 TRILLION.

I'll put up a buck, and I'l give 10:1 odds I can get a million more by Monday!

12 posted on 09/30/2009 9:28:36 AM PDT by WVKayaker (Futility: trying to slam a revolving door!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BAW

I love the Democratic excuses: y’all wouldn’t understand the bills
even if you read them.

HOW THE H-LL would the Senators/Reps. know?
They don’t read the bills themselves!!!!!


13 posted on 09/30/2009 9:33:19 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BAW

I’d be happy with a “10 Minutes per Page” standard.


14 posted on 09/30/2009 9:50:48 AM PDT by PizzaDriver ( on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VOA

Listening to limbaugh, we are screwed. There is nothing we can do. They are going to pass this healthcare stuff through an amendment and the public won’t even know about it


15 posted on 09/30/2009 9:51:05 AM PDT by ground_fog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Bills are all ready available on http://thomas.loc.gov/
Congress just needs to put them up in time.


16 posted on 09/30/2009 9:54:44 AM PDT by vaskypilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: napscoordinator

“Who would pay for it? That would be a huge undertaking because you can’t just throw the word perfect copy on the web...it would have to PDF at least.”

This is not a problem.


18 posted on 09/30/2009 10:14:34 AM PDT by Bhoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

re: By the way, we should INSIST that these bills be written in PLAIN LANGUAGE that is easily understood.

Amen! In addition to the actual language of the bill there should be a simple explanation of the intention of bill.

And then I come to my senses and I hear a far away voice saying, “Dream on!”


19 posted on 09/30/2009 10:38:50 AM PDT by jwparkerjr (God Bless America, and wake us up while you're about it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BAW

If they want exceptions for emergencies, the emergency bill should expire in 5 days while they pass the non-emergency version.


20 posted on 09/30/2009 10:39:58 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson