Posted on 09/29/2009 6:11:26 PM PDT by Libloather
Why hasn't Charlie Rangel stepped down?
After documented reports of his sweetheart deals, influence peddling, unreported assets, and untaxed income, Charlie Rangel is still chairman of the House Committee on Ways and Means. Can't anyone tell him to move aside?
Francis Wilkinson
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Glenn Beck launched an attack against the Obama administration's "green jobs" director Van Jones in the last week of August. By Labor Day, Jones was FOX-kill. Compare that to the results achieved by The New York Times and The Washington Post, both of which have called for New York Rep. Charles Rangel to step down as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. The newspapers began urging Rangel to step aside back in 2008; it's now close to 2010 and Rangel hasn't budged.
Unlike Jones, Rangel doesn't have a colorful past as a leftist and signer of a conspiracy statement suggesting that President Bush knew the planes were headed for the towers. And when it comes to causing a ruckus, the Times and the Post are disadvantaged by their adherence to standards of decorum and fair play that Beck subverts for a living. But Rangel's transgressions appear so plentiful and severe that it's a wonder he still has a job, let alone the chairmanship of the tax-writing committee that the Times calls "one of the most powerful bodies in American government."
The trouble started in July, 2008, when the Times exposed Rangel's possession of four rent-stabilized apartments in a building owned by a major real estate developer. (In New York City, real estate is one part location, two parts politics). The Times calculated that this improbably sweet deal was saving Rangel $30,000 a year in rent.
Four days later, the Post pitched in with a report on another Rangel scandal. For an academic center Rangel had launched with a $1.9 million earmark, and which would be named in his honor, he was soliciting donations from corporate interests that had business before his committee. He even used his congressional letterhead. As if that wasn't unseemly enough, Rangel won a superlative character reference from none other than Donald Trump, who told the Post, "Charlie Rangel is the most honorable, honest politician in Washington." Yikes.
The close timing of the articles was likely pure coincidence—not unlike a bullet coincidentally finding the back of a mobster's head at point-blank range. Rangel had displeased some people in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary, perhaps not so much by his endorsement of fellow New Yorker Hillary Clinton for president, which was politics, but by running interference for the Clintons when they began playing the racial angle against Obama after the New Hampshire primary. That was politics, too, but of a sort that some in Rangel's Harlem district and elsewhere didn't much appreciate. A short time later, both the Times and the Post had interesting scoops.
It didn't end there. The Times later reported that Rangel owned a vacation property in the Dominican Republic, acquired on favorable terms, for which he had long failed to pay taxes on rental income. More recently, Rangel altered his congressional financial disclosure form to reveal an additional $500,000 in assets—at a minimum, one-fifth of his total reported wealth—that had somehow slipped his mind. While the House ethics committee investigates, Rangel has wisely opted for the what-a-dunce-I-am! explanation of his conduct. The alternative, of course, is the what-a-sleazeball-I-am! rationale, which spin doctors generally advise against.
Meantime, the gregarious, good-time Charlie is still chairman of Ways and Means. Speaker Nancy Pelosi hasn't pushed him out and it looks like the combined force of the Post and the Times isn't up to the task, either. The Buffalo News last month became the first paper in New York State to call for Rangel's resignation, which might be a sign of momentum, but is more likely just another lament from the north about the habits of politicians downstate. Perhaps Democrats in Washington are afraid to sacrifice Rangel. The next ranking Democrat on the committee is Pete Stark of California, the only professed atheist in Congress. (You can hear the shrieks of hysteria rising in the distance.)
So who knows? Despite all his foul-ups, maybe Rangel will remain chairman of "one of the most powerful bodies in American government." Or maybe his removal will have to wait until someone with real influence and stature in American politics insists that Rangel step down. Someone, that is, like Glenn Beck.
Why would he? He has the support of the President and the house and the senate......
Is there any comparison between Charlie Rangel and Al Capone in regards to how much IRS/tax fraud has been perpetrated on all of us?
He’s no more a crook than the rest of the Dem Leadership.
I would naturally expect that his employers, We the People, haven’t yet made it clear enough for him to understand his circumstance.
Corruption is only bad when Republicans do it, and good heavens, don’t we have enough racism in our country?
Consider the following modest prediction. 1. House Dems get killed (and barely keep control); survivors, including a few lucky so-called Blue Dogs, revolt and appoint a true, if there are any, Blue Dog. 2. Republicans miraculously gain control (maybe by getting a few BD’s to switch with promises of good comm. assignments). Pelosi’s own district cuts off her Botox and sends just another liberal beatch.
Pitchforks and torches, tar and feathers will be the only thing that can get him removed....and the chances of that?
Capone had more money than Rangel.
If Rangel’s day of reckoning is to come it will be in a court of law. His peers will look the other way to protect him and to avoid pissing off the congressional black caucus.
Because he is a Democrat...
Cause he might lose his four rent-controlled NYC apartments and also have to pay his back taxes and we wouldn’t want that.
us mere mortals have to make do with only one....
How comes he skates on this also....?
True. He has more to learn from the San Fran Nan about special spousal contracts and from Harry Reid about how to do land deals. So much corruption still to learn for Charlie and so little time you know.
Charlie is larger than life so he can occupy four residences at one time. Hence, they all qualify as primary residences.
Us peons do well to show in up one at a time.
Who’s gonna make him step down? His party controls the country.
He’ll be dead soon. This is as good as it gets for Charlie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.