Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lecherous fugitive director indignant about 30-year-delayed arrest
Michelle Malkin.com ^ | 09/28/09 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 09/28/2009 4:16:06 AM PDT by RowdyFFC

I wrote about perv director Roman Polanski’s pampered fugitive life six years ago here.

Justice is finally catching up with the admitted seducer of young girls. He was arrested in Zurich this weekend, much to the “great consternation and shock” of his friends in the artistic community.

For a graphic reminder of what Polanski is accused of doing to his 13-year-old alleged victim — and how an L.A. Times sophisticate is pooh-poohing the brutal act — go here.

Bring a strong stomach. And expect more crime-coddling apologists to defend Polanski in 3, 2, 1…

(Excerpt) Read more at michellemalkin.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: culture; hollywood; polanski; rape; sodomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Like she said, you have to have a strong stomache to read the article linked to read it...

And the California whacko elitests are griping about the cost to the government to prosecute and house this pedophiliac for the rest of his life, while letting other criminals go.

I say they should confiscate his wealth and use it to house him and not put this burden on the people.

The culture cult in Hollywood has frankly lost it's freaking mind promoting that it is not worth the $$'s to bring this man to justice.

1 posted on 09/28/2009 4:16:07 AM PDT by RowdyFFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC

FTA:
“Justice is finally catching up with the admitted seducer of young girls”

He was not a seducer but a RAPIST.


2 posted on 09/28/2009 4:24:32 AM PDT by BilLies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BilLies

I guess if you want to “seduce” a 13 year old girl, it helps to slip a few qualudes into them first.

I hope he rots in jail.


3 posted on 09/28/2009 4:28:16 AM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC; BilLies

I just know I’m going to get into troulbe here, but oh well!

During the past week I’ve ticked off a lot of people defending a young woman who had, supposedly, consensual intercourse with four ‘very large’ young men in a university campus lavatory. Initially, she had charged them with rape, but one of the guys had recorded the ‘interlude’ on his cell phone. (How gross!)

The young men were described as “innocent sons” and I took umbrage with that description as I felt NO ONE in this case was ‘innocent’. Though rape hadn’t been proved, I felt ALL should be punished for a heinous act in a public restroom and that rape, four against one in this case, would have been impossible to prove unless this young woman had fought the four men and been beaten to death.

Now, in this case involving Polanski, who in the past has made a fuss about the girl’s mother giving permission for him to have sexual intercourse with the woman’s daughter, I see evil on the part of the adults.

I feel that BOTH Polanski and the girl’s mother ought to be prosecuted for this crime.

What say you guys?


4 posted on 09/28/2009 4:37:47 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC

I hope they throw him into a cell with Phil Spector and let them both rot together.


5 posted on 09/28/2009 4:44:41 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

I’m not sure which other case you are referring to, but if the woman had consetual sex with four men, she cannot come back and cry rape after satisfying herself very thoroughly with the performance of four young men. Nope, that dog don’t hunt. They were all adults.

However, in the case of Polanski, the mother, and a 13 year old child, yes, I agree. Both adults were guilty of crimes against the child.


6 posted on 09/28/2009 4:44:47 AM PDT by RowdyFFC (Nancy Pelosi...please deny her any health care....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Polanski is a munchkin, 4’-6” tall, so only girls 10-13 years old are attractive to him. His wife (beard) is twice his height.
7 posted on 09/28/2009 4:48:47 AM PDT by RoshYisrael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC

My argument in the former case was simple: many young women just give up and give in to sex when pressured, even when they do not really want to have intercourse.

The alternative, to say no and risk physical harm, even death, is frankly not much of a choice.

To prove rape when the victim is unharmed is difficult, if not impossible.


8 posted on 09/28/2009 4:53:29 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RoshYisrael

Anyone who suggests this bum should not be prosecuted deserves to be put in a cell with him, forever.


9 posted on 09/28/2009 4:53:34 AM PDT by Mouton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC

Upon the perp’s return, could a pardon from “The One” be possible?


10 posted on 09/28/2009 4:59:14 AM PDT by luvbach1 (Worse than we could have imagined.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
I feel that BOTH Polanski and the girl’s mother ought to be prosecuted for this crime.

Polanski WAS prosecuted, convicted and sentenced for the crime.

He fled the country to escape Justice. No further prosecution is necessary. Bring him back, lock his ass away for the rest of his natural life.

As for the mother?

Take that up with the prosecutors. Polanski confessed to the crime, now he keeps a long delayed appointment with the California Department of Corrections.
11 posted on 09/28/2009 5:31:58 AM PDT by mkjessup (0bama?!?!? ********* YOU LIE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ************)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
You will get no argument from me. Some decades ago, in Albany, a mother took her 8-10 year old daughter to a rendezvous with a pervert (for money) and stayed with them while the pervert fondled the girl. Caught, tried and convicted.
12 posted on 09/28/2009 5:58:04 AM PDT by BilLies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
Holder is a master at working things out. Do you think Polanski is more attuned to Obama or ________ (anyone else)?
13 posted on 09/28/2009 6:01:52 AM PDT by BilLies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RoshYisrael
Polanski is a munchkin, 4’-6”

He's over 5 foot. He's small, but not that small. Do you have a source for this height figure?

14 posted on 09/28/2009 6:10:15 AM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
...I felt ALL should be punished for a heinous act in a public restroom and that rape, four against one in this case, would have been impossible to prove unless this young woman had fought the four men and been beaten to death.

Under the law we don't punish heinous acts, we punish crimes. The young men were innocent (which is a legal term by the way, not a moral term) of any crime, and whatever noncrime you think they were guilty of is not to be punished by a court of law. The only other crime that the five could be prosecuted for might be public indecency, but since no one saw them the five could only be prosecuted if some or all of them gave up their 5th Amendment rights.

The courts are overfilled with criminal cases now. Inventing a way to proscribe sexual acts that you or I might find repugnant, but which are presently legal, is not the way to go.

15 posted on 09/28/2009 6:15:07 AM PDT by Cheburashka (Stephen Decatur: you want barrels of gunpowder as tribute, you must expect cannonballs with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

I heard on the radio this morning that his attorneys were going to ask for bail.

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha..

I would just throw him in a dark hole when he steps off the plane.


16 posted on 09/28/2009 6:42:59 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution - 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
I would invite all of the Polanski apologists to bring their 13 year old daughters for a private audience with Roman, if what he did doesn't bother them now, they ought to be ok with him being 'interviewed' by their own children, eh?
17 posted on 09/28/2009 7:07:53 AM PDT by mkjessup (0bama is doing to the economy what Roman Polanski did to his victim. And without lube.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
“I hope they throw him into a cell with Phil Spector and let them both rot together.”

Better yet, throw him in the cell next to Charles Manson

18 posted on 09/28/2009 9:19:18 AM PDT by Bookie1066 (It's not going to be Atlas Shrugged but Atlas Shot Back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Malsua

no, just making sarcasm.


19 posted on 09/28/2009 9:41:39 AM PDT by RoshYisrael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC

The MSM has seen fit to scrub his crime of its most foul aspects.

He took a 13 old girl to the house of a Hollywood star, plied her with drugs and alcohol, FORCIBLY raped her, forcibly sodomized her, and apparently thought nothing of it. Following his own admission of guilt within a court of law, he fled the country and had his life glamorized by the degenerates of Hollweird.

If it was one of my daughters he forcibly raped, the joke would have been, “what goes into the back of a fugitive-rapist’s head once, and chest twice?”


20 posted on 09/28/2009 11:45:08 AM PDT by M203M4 (NEW New Deal: A pot through every window!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson