Maddow is really reaching...
1 posted on
09/26/2009 1:08:19 AM PDT by
Rufus2007
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Rufus2007
The local cable company took MSNBC away from its basic subscribers (yours truly). So I don’t have to watch or listen to that blantantly pro-Obama propaganda machine.
To: Rufus2007
Well if you think she’s dumb as a rock, consider the brilliance of the geniuses who pay her salary...
3 posted on
09/26/2009 1:15:01 AM PDT by
DB
To: Rufus2007
Easily the most bitter among the talking heads...he’s always acting like Bush was elected Consul for Life...yesterday.
4 posted on
09/26/2009 1:17:27 AM PDT by
Carlos Martillo II
(Guernica was a work of art...and I don't mean the painting.)
To: Rufus2007
Corporations, vastly financed through union retirement investing, don’t want poor people. Poor people can’t buy their products, are more discerning in price, and typically won’t purchase the high value products that have the most profit.
To say that corporations want to attack ACORN because they help poor people is just to use the boogey-man excuse. The ‘evil corporation’ is against us, we have to stop them... We have to tax them! Whereas without corporations, millions of brainless liberals would be unemployed, their retirements wasted on commodity bets.
Heck, MSNBC wouldn’t exist, as were it not for the overall efficency of a corporation like NBC, they’d never be able to produce such a news channel. Whenever I hear a liberal go off on the corporations, I crow with glee, and say, so long Corporation for Public Broadcasting! Man, do they backpeddle quick on that.
6 posted on
09/26/2009 1:24:34 AM PDT by
kingu
(Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
To: Rufus2007
Maddow’s argument might make some sense if she were to first admit that ACORN, Rainbow Push, etc. regularly extort money from big business and taxpayers in the name of “diversity,” “social justice,” or “racial discrimination.”
8 posted on
09/26/2009 1:32:31 AM PDT by
browardchad
("Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own fact" - Daniel P Moynihan)
To: Rufus2007
To paraphrase Dan Aykroyd on SNL “Rachel, you ignorant slut!”
9 posted on
09/26/2009 1:42:32 AM PDT by
tophat9000
(Obama plans to fix America like he fixed his dog)
To: Rufus2007
The communists are always “helping poor people,” usually the party elites who grab the power. It’s just ordinary people who benefit from the operation of markets that they hurt.
11 posted on
09/26/2009 2:38:54 AM PDT by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
To: Rufus2007
But Maddow rose to the defense of ACORN which she called a right-wing "bogeyman," crusading for them on her MSNBC show. She accused corporations of going into "kill mode" against the organization which helps "poor people." ... going into "kill mode" against the organization that helps "poor people" to find illegal alien child prostitutes that they can afford. Is that really something she wants to protect?
12 posted on
09/26/2009 2:46:29 AM PDT by
TurtleUp
([...Insert today's quote from Community-Organizer-in-Chief...] - Obama, YOU LIE!)
To: Rufus2007
These liberals wonder how facism took hold in Europe.
This is nothing but rabid leftist idealism; a destructive religion.
13 posted on
09/26/2009 2:46:35 AM PDT by
ChiMark
To: Rufus2007
Go, Rachel, go. Please continue to defend ACORN. The more you have yourself on record as supporting those criminals, the more your pathetic career will tank.
14 posted on
09/26/2009 3:06:25 AM PDT by
FLAMING DEATH
(Are you better off than you were $4 trillion ago?)
To: Rufus2007
They consistently mis-spell “MAD COW” in these stories about Dear Rachel.
16 posted on
09/26/2009 3:09:57 AM PDT by
Iron Munro
(You can't kill the beast while sucking at its teat - Claire Wolfe)
To: Rufus2007
"She accused corporations of going into "kill mode" against the organization which helps "poor people." "
The liberals think anything is legal as long as it hides under the guise of "helping poor people".
Sorry, that dog won't hunt.
I grew up in a cotton-mill town in Georgia in the 40's and 50's, and it had more than it's share of "poor people". But these people did not break the law, they worked everyday and helped each other survive. They didn't need outfits like ACORN to insure their survivial. They had the churches and each other...and no laws were broken in the process.
If establishing a prostitution ring of underage girls is ACORN's way of "helping the poor", the the poor are much better off without them.
Actually, ACORN helps ACORN first and foremost, then the selected POLS that protect them...i.e. commiebama.
The media and acorn can shovel that "helping the poor" bu11s#!+ all they want, but only the stupid believe it.
17 posted on
09/26/2009 3:10:23 AM PDT by
FrankR
( We're up to "reverse discrimination"...what's next, "reverse SLAVERY"?)
To: Rufus2007
They help people vote who are too poor to even exist.
19 posted on
09/26/2009 3:12:36 AM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
To: Rufus2007
Rachel darling, you work for a corporation.
20 posted on
09/26/2009 3:45:22 AM PDT by
poobear
To: Rufus2007
I am trying to imagine what motive corporations would have for killing poor people. It just doesn't compute. Not only is this woman an idiot for trying to make the argument but anyone that would listen to her do so is probably a few neurons short as well. How would a corporation make money killing poor people?
Μολὼν λάβε
21 posted on
09/26/2009 3:50:51 AM PDT by
wastoute
(translation of tag "Come and get them (bastards)" or "come get some")
To: Rufus2007
It sure is difficult to decide if Rachel Maddow is a ‘pimp’ or a ‘hooker’ for the poor.
To: Rufus2007
Isn’t it amazing how these left wing stations can say things like that as a fact and get away with it? And the dumber then dumb audience believes it..............
25 posted on
09/26/2009 4:02:01 AM PDT by
blueyon
(It is worth taking a stand even if you are standing alone!)
To: Rufus2007
NBC, GE, and Maddow do it for (and to) the children.
26 posted on
09/26/2009 4:17:45 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
To: Rufus2007
She’s still the San Francisco Lesbian Activist she was before her TV gig. Nothing surprising here.
To: Rufus2007
But Maddow rose to the defense of ACORN which she called a right-wing "bogeyman," crusading for them on her MSNBC show. She accused corporations of going into "kill mode" against the organization which helps "poor people." Helps poor people scam the government.
33 posted on
09/26/2009 5:15:20 AM PDT by
Always Right
(Obama owes Joe Willson an apology!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson