Taitz and her cases get a lot of attention on the conservative Internet dn in the new media. Berg has gotten a lot of attention also because he was early in the game. Both have had webites from the beginning of the eligibility law suits. Appuzzo and Donofrio have far better webites, fewer cases and headlines and far more thorough scholarship.
Hemenway was entered into the Hollister case which Berg claims as his but really, as it turns out, was conceived of by Lawrence Joyce.
The principle of the Hollister case, the use of Interpleader, is well conceived, simpler to comprehend and likely to result in other such lawsuits around the country. Standing is far less of a problem in such suits and there is no issue of mootness. There are other reasons that the Hollister case, now on appeal, is a better bet than some of ht other suits.
If no websites or places such as FSM or WND bring it up to date as far as conservative Internet coverage, I’ll look into doing something. There have been recent filings.
John Hemenway has the experience in leadership and, as a long time conservative who is both a military and cold war veteran and helped found groups such as AIM, the character to become a ledder and create a good central point of communication that can be trusted to move the growing
movement to do something effective about the situation forward.
Thanks for the explanation. I try to keep track as the subject interests me *greatly* but legalese is not even my second language plus time prevents me from reading as much on FR as I would like to!