Posted on 09/24/2009 6:56:35 PM PDT by HonCitizen
Odd then, the report missed that. Know you suspected a trick of some sort. Maybe amnesty is the camels nose in the tent. Permitting him to campaign for another candidate would be an invitation to incite violence.
they may try to attempt a “paralell govt”. but this would fail because nor the people or the army and police would obey Z.
Good to hear!
Have you noticed that Zero spells with the same Z as Zelaya?
BTW there’s someone on this tread trying to defend Z.
And Zero and Chavez share more things in common: they have a problem with FOX news! Maybe they were separated at birth.
Any defender of Zelaya is either a communist, crazy or both.
Heck, I read that Zelaya is still wearing a grubby Che shirt. Maybe he’ll switch for a clean Mao one tomorrow.
ping
Freepmail me to be added to / removed from Honduras ping list. Please ping me to threads of interest.
He doesn't respect our Constitution. Why would he respect theirs?
Darn right.
“Schock contends that as a private citizen, Zelaya was entitled to campaign for the candidate of their choice in the upcoming elections, but if it incites violence should be arrested and prosecuted.”
How many Hondurans would have to die in the streets when Zelaya’s Marxist thugs got going?
“Before Zelaya could be a private citizen and campaign for the candidate of his choice, wouldn’t he first have to stand trial in accord with Honduran Law?”
Didn’t Zelaya steal 2 million from some bank before he left?
I was thinking of a "teachable moment" over beers in the back yard of the White Crib.
0bozo acted stupidly. /s (actually he knows exactly what he's doing)
No, you read it exactly right. He instantly lost his citizenship for his actions. The legislature and SC actually gave him a pass on that two or three times by not acting on that clause of their constitution. They warned him to cease and desist in those first instances and he did not. They did that for the good of the country because there is no legal obstacle requiring them to have patience with a traitor.
“He instantly lost his citizenship for his actions.”
Huston, we have a problem. While I am delighted the cringing, boot licking MSM have finally acknowledged his removal from office was legit, the rest of the story needs to be told.
The new meme is Zelaya’s booting from the country ‘wrong’ and not due to his loss of citizenship upon the decision handed down from the Supreme Court.
While the Zelaya crowd have suffered a tactical defeat on one of their main points, the ‘wrongful removal from country’ could be very damaging if successful.
Or at least that’s how it looks to me.
Do readers see the Zelaya crowd being forced back down from this tactic?
It has been claimed, as in this report, that he had to be formally stripped of citizenship in order to deport him. I haven't seen in their constitution or other legal statutes that they have to do that. It makes sense that they would have to but their legal system is different and no one has made a factual case that it is required.
Their constitution clearly states that citizenship is lost for the actions Zelaya repeatedly engaged in.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.