Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Ken Burns a Secret Propagandist for Socialism?
Los Angeles Times ^ | September 24, 2009 | Patrick Goldstein

Posted on 09/24/2009 6:44:56 PM PDT by nickcarraway

SNIP

In other words, the entire origin of the national park system, whose most passionate backer was a Republican, Teddy Roosevelt, is based on a firm belief in -- Glenn Beck, cover your ears, please -- government intervention to regulate an out-of-control free-enterprise system. In fact, one of the more dramatic moments in Burns' documentary involves the battle to create a park in the Great Smoky Mountains, while logging companies bankrolled anti-park ads and were "frantically cutting the old-growth forests to extract everything they could before the land was closed to them."

In some ways, Burns' new series sounds like almost as radical a critique of free market excess as Michael Moore's new "Capitalism: A Love Story." Of course, it's unlikely to cause as much of an uproar as "Capitalism" because Moore is a natural magnet for controversy while Burns' films, with their lilting music and cozy slo-mo zooms, can make the most incendiary historical events appear almost as soothing as a glass of warm milk.

However, Poniewozik has uncovered the razor blade inside Burns' cinematic pillow. To hear him tell it, Burns' portrait of the creation of our national parks should give conservatives pause in their rush to pillory government at every turn. As Poniewozik writes: "The national parks -- and 'The National Parks' -- are based on ideas that are classically, if not radically, communitarian: That the free market doesn't always act in the public interest. That it's good that every American shares ownership of and responsibility for the most exclusive properties in the country.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: kenburns; nationalparks; nosecret; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: TexasNative2000
I agree with you. And, BTW, you couldn't care less about his politics. Me neither.
41 posted on 09/24/2009 9:37:54 PM PDT by drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
Shenandoah isn't all that hot. It's a nice drive, but nothing special except to the bikers and roadster crowd. I think it was mostly a make-work project near enough to the media in Washington to show that Roosevelt's WPA/CCC was working in creating jobs.

The Washington-Jefferson National Forest already existed and could have been turned into a park, but Virginia/FDR decided to expropriate land and build a road to nowhere. You've got to actually get into the mountains for the WAsh/Jeff Forest, so maybe FDR's advisors told him he needed something closer to DC.

42 posted on 09/24/2009 9:58:09 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("Do you call it 'unsound method'?" "No method at all," I murmured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

New York Republicans are the original RINOs. Teddy Roosevelt was a socialist, a racist, an imperialist, and a Big-Government nanny-stater par excellence.


43 posted on 09/24/2009 9:59:27 PM PDT by gorilla_warrior (Metrosexual hairless RINOs for hopey-changey bipartisan-ness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drew

I couldn’t agree with you more......


44 posted on 09/25/2009 4:15:49 AM PDT by TexasNative2000 (I may not be John Galt or Jim Thompson, but I AM THE MOB!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

HELLO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


45 posted on 09/25/2009 5:36:57 AM PDT by lionheart 247365 (-:{ 0bama's dream is an American NIGHTMARE }:-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Motorheadlemmy

That’s because Ken Burns IS a “Friend of Dorothy.” You will see him with his partner at any function.


46 posted on 09/25/2009 5:40:34 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

He sees everything through the prism of Civil Rights. Always has.


47 posted on 09/26/2009 7:10:16 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: what's up
How so? I've seen a bunch of his films and they focus almost exclusively on personal stories and racial discrimination.
48 posted on 09/26/2009 7:12:47 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Burns is on the government payroll. The subjects of his films will never be anything more than window dressing for his “government is good, more government is better” narrative.


49 posted on 09/28/2009 9:32:35 PM PDT by mbs6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson