[CottShop]

[[That sounds like a “model”.]]

I don’t htink it woudl be a model, simply because the IC is more than the parts- Nature can’t create the necessary info or IC- too tired to noodle this over today- will have to htink this through more tonight- but basically an ID was needed to do what nature coudl not model naturally. If life was nothign more than naturally occuring info building and building, connecting and connecting, then I guiess it woudl be a model, but IC in species is above and beyond thsoe simplistic ‘law following’ connections- God does use laws, but He also went above and beyond creating what nature was incapable of creating (mainly info and metainfo, but also IC systems that defy natural means)

Again- too tired right now

[tacticalogic]

I don’t htink it woudl be a model, simply because the IC is more than the parts- Nature can’t create the necessary info or IC- too tired to noodle this over today- will have to htink this through more tonight- but basically an ID was needed to do what nature coudl not model naturally. If life was nothign more than naturally occuring info building and building, connecting and connecting, then I guiess it woudl be a model, but IC in species is above and beyond thsoe simplistic ‘law following’ connections- God does use laws, but He also went above and beyond creating what nature was incapable of creating (mainly info and metainfo, but also IC systems that defy natural means)

You've just constructed a model of "nature", complete with built in assumptions of what it can and cannot do.