Just repeating myself a bit here, CottShop! To put it another way, all I was saying is that no one has ever shown (or demonstrated) that all causes in nature MUST be "natural" ones. There is apparent intelligence at work in nature. From what I understand of methodological naturalism, intelligence would not be a "natural" cause, since it has no material basis.
You wrote:
We know nature isn’t capable of the foresight and anticipation seen in the complexity of Metainformation, and it certainly couldn’t arise from chemicals— hence I think it can be quite strongly shown that an intelligent Designer capable of anticipating and planning was needed.Sounds perfectly reasonable to me, dear CottShop!
Thank you ever so much for writing!
To put it another way, all I was saying is that no one has ever shown (or demonstrated) that all causes in nature must NOT be "natural" ones.
[[Just repeating myself a bit here, CottShop! To put it another way, all I was saying is that no one has ever shown (or demonstrated) that all causes in nature MUST be “natural” ones.]]
I think I misread you the first time- I thought you were inferring that ‘noone could show who the supernatural is’, which is why I answered what I did- Your statement above makes it more clear that you were speaking aobut somethign different- to which I agree and to which the site I lsited above pretty much says what you said.