Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop

>>Science makes no presuppositions about the existence or non-existence of transcendent causes. Neither does science make any presuppositions regarding the influence or effect a transcendent cause might have in the material world or the ability or inability of science, using the methods of empirical science, to detect those influences or effects.<<

That is a non-statement. Science follows the facts in the physical world. If it leads to an ID, then he/she/it has many questions to answer.

You’re so cute. Do your mommy and daddy know you use their computer thingy late at night to pretend you are a grown-up?

Check your Dr. Pepper can — it is probably close to empty.

But it won’t.

ID is just for people who are too lazy to do real science. It boils down to “it is tooo HARD, so IDdidit.”

It amazes me you pop off so much on these threads with so little understanding of real science (not the metaphysical science you try to pass off with many words of little meaning).


484 posted on 09/30/2009 8:34:36 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003

[[You’re so cute. Do your mommy and daddy know you use their computer thingy late at night to pretend you are a grown-up?]]

Isn’t that precious? Playground insults- Golly- you’re progressign from rational to childish at amazing speed

[[ID is just for people who are too lazy to do real science. It boils down to “it is tooo HARD, so IDdidit.”]]

I think you meant to say ‘just an undying FAITH in naturalism and it’s miraculous, science violating abilities would aparently serve us well’ Macroevolution isn’t based on science- it’s based on a philosophical ideological beleif that straysd outside of science- again- let’s see the evidnece showing nature was soemhow able to violate scientific principles- or are you just goign to insult creationsits and ID’ists the rest of your life? If thats’ all you got- then whatever- we understand- being married to a failed hypothesis is like battered wife syndrome- you know it’s wrong to stay, but you just can’t leave because you think ‘one day things will be different’

[[It amazes me you pop off so much on these threads with so little understanding of real science]]

Still not goign to address any of the issue brought up eh? Whatever


486 posted on 09/30/2009 8:39:03 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003

[[That is a non-statement. Science follows the facts in the physical world. If it leads to an ID, then he/she/it has many questions to answer.]]

WOW! did you miss the p oint!


487 posted on 09/30/2009 8:40:31 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson