[[ Hte fact you don’t understand science and thus see it as “magic” is your issue and certainly not to be put on the backs of schoolchildren.]]
Ah yes- we should just keep beating it into their brains that ‘we don’t know how nature violated several key scientific principles, but by golly... ‘it just did’ and ‘we just don’t have the answers yet’ Swell copout! Nature HAS to be magical IF it somehow violated several key scientific principles trillions of times- infact, it has to be downright supernatural- Tell us Freedumb- how did nature accomplish these supernatural feats? “It just did” and “You just don’t understand science” isn’t an answer I’m afraid!
You posted several amusing non-responses, so I took a flyer and landed on this one.
Nature isn't "magical" -- and your assertion (it does not even rise to contention) that because you don't understand simple processes such as stochasticism, somehow millions of real scientists analyzing and interpreting billions of artifacts across hundreds of years have been toiling in fields of error doesn't even meet the laugh test.
You again purposefully misinterpret my simple analysis: a supernatural process embedded in an observed physical process must expose itself for complete breakdown or be completely discounted as having no applicability (please reread my posts for content to understand this idea).
Your attempts to climb the intellectual mountains of science are analogous to the linguists who has noted that all languages across the galaxy have a "jin-n-tonix" construct and do not buttress anything other than your circular references.
And please respect your audience enough to post both proper spelling and grammar. You reveal your ignorance in the large things by demonstrating your ignorance in the small things.