To: tacticalogic; CottShop
Okay. I believe that scientific claims based on evidence known to be false should be considered criminal fraud. Do you find that a resonable proposition? Well, in light of Piltdown Man, archaeoraptor, Lucy, and other frauds, that might not be such a bad proposition.
Considering the amount of fraud that goes on in the scientific community, that'll come back to bite them.
255 posted on
09/28/2009 8:56:05 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
Well, in light of Piltdown Man, archaeoraptor, Lucy, and other frauds, that might not be such a bad proposition. Considering the amount of fraud that goes on in the scientific community, that'll come back to bite them.
If the literal account of Genesis is "Fact", then any theory that disagrees with it is based on evidence known to be false - arguably a criminal offense.
260 posted on
09/28/2009 9:02:06 PM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson