Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop

All Bull.
Lets have the peer reviewed journal articles on these points.Show how each point is wrong showing the data and how the data backs up your hypothesis. Real scientific work.

Please read SOME textbooks on some of these fields so you have a basic knowledge first.


201 posted on 09/26/2009 1:02:54 PM PDT by Wacka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: Wacka

[[All Bull]]

Lol- All bull huh? Refute them then! Blah Blah Blah

[[Show how each point is wrong showing the data and how the data backs up your hypothesis.]]

we DID- As did the article writers which were cited- you apaprently slept through them all

[[Please read SOME textbooks on some of these fields so you have a basic knowledge first.
]]

Lol- We’ve got a great more basic knowledg than those who can apparently only stomp their foot and scream “All Bull!” I noticed you ducked out of those discussions and threads I listed quite early on after you found out peopel weren’t goign to have any of your ‘All Bull” Arguments lol- but whatever- the threads, science, evidences speak for themselves- your “All Bull’ Magic wand of dismissaal isn’t goign to work this time Spanky


203 posted on 09/26/2009 10:45:10 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: Wacka

[[Show how each point is wrong showing the data and how the data backs up your hypothesis.]]

Tell ya what lovebug- You show how each point of Macroevolution is right, showing the data to prove lfie can escape the second law, how dirty chemicals can miraculously purify themselves without help from an intellignet designer’s design, how amino acids can make the impoissible leap to protiens on their own via simple mutations- How life escaped the limitations of upper prbability limits- let’s see the science- the data that backs up your position

Oh- and by the way- Radio Halos ARE peer reviewed and have stood the test of time and peer reviwed scrutiny for over 2 decades now, and chemical engineers are not capable of producing life out of non life- We’re tried and failed many times- The data more supports the NEED for an intelligent Designer than it supports the impossible scenario called Macroevolution- Have fun looking htose threads up- (Not that I expect you will- you’ll just continue whining about ID being ‘All Bull” lol)


206 posted on 09/26/2009 10:58:36 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson