[[Show how each point is wrong showing the data and how the data backs up your hypothesis.]]
Tell ya what lovebug- You show how each point of Macroevolution is right, showing the data to prove lfie can escape the second law, how dirty chemicals can miraculously purify themselves without help from an intellignet designer’s design, how amino acids can make the impoissible leap to protiens on their own via simple mutations- How life escaped the limitations of upper prbability limits- let’s see the science- the data that backs up your position
Oh- and by the way- Radio Halos ARE peer reviewed and have stood the test of time and peer reviwed scrutiny for over 2 decades now, and chemical engineers are not capable of producing life out of non life- We’re tried and failed many times- The data more supports the NEED for an intelligent Designer than it supports the impossible scenario called Macroevolution- Have fun looking htose threads up- (Not that I expect you will- you’ll just continue whining about ID being ‘All Bull” lol)
First of all Evolution does NOT address how life started. It never has. Creves bring that up as a strawman.
What the hell do “radio halos” have to do with evolution?
And what the hell are they?
Bring up the points one at a time. Reference the journal articles backing your point (not magazine articles, FR threads, or bible passages). Then people on our side can bring up ours as a rebuttal. That is the way a civil debate happens.
[[Show how each point is wrong showing the data and how the data backs up your hypothesis.]]
This is how things are proven right or wrong in science.
I’ll be back on Monday. Tomorrow, I’m going hiking and then watching football and drinking. As a “atheistic liberal” I’m not going to church.