Replies

[[Show PROOF that they are wrong assumptions, and which specific assumptions are they.]]

We’ve doen so many times- We’ve shown that dirty chemicals can not give birth to metainformation, we’ve shown proof that radio-alos form very quickly (a peer reviewed scientific research discovery that has stood the test of scrutiny now for over 2 decades btw) we’ve shown that nature vioaltes the second law, and we’ve shown that the silly argument that ‘the second law doesn’t apply in an open system’ is just that- a very silly ‘argument’ to make, we’ve shown that biologically, DNA does not just occure all on it’s own and that amino acids can not make the biologically impossible leap to protiens, and that RNA can’t produce life without being intelligently and artificially manipulated in intelligently designed experiments, we’ve shown that the dating methods used past 5-9,000 years is based on nothign but assumptions (I’ve personally listed links that point out the myriad problems associated with all the major dating methods beyond carbon dating) we’ve shown that dino soft tissue is another problem for old age, several times, we’ve shown that the fossil records show discontinuity, NOT common descent which hasn’t a shred of actual evidence to back up and is nothign but another far-fetched assumption, we’ve shown the deception in the ‘charts of ear evolution’ which was a gross and blatant deception, we’ve shown that higher complexity blood clotting could NOT evolve without intelligent design (and I’ve personally dissected Miller’s silly argument and shown that he unwittingly proved nature could NOT have produced or evolved higher complexity blood clotting, and that it would be impossible for nature to do so without several MIRACLES that violate nature happening) on and on it goes!!!

the proof is right here on FR- happy hunting-