Of course there are opportunities for non-sinful behavior to bring on AIDS, but those are so few that your argument doesn’t hold water. You seem quite happy that a vaccine that has only a 31% effectiveness may become available. You deride someone for saying that staying away from sinful ways virtually guarantees you won’t get AIDS. This is entirely true. When less than 1/3 of one percent of people in the US have AIDS and of that 1/3 of one percent, only 2.18 percent of those got AIDS from a transfusion or some other “non-sinful” way.
For being named “Eagle Eye,” you are completely blind.
You seem quite happy that a vaccine that has only a 31% effectiveness may become available. Provide my quote that states that or shut up.
You deride someone for saying that staying away from sinful ways virtually guarantees you won’t get AIDS. This is entirely true.
First off, provide my quote where I deride someone for advocating abstaining from 'sinful' ways...and again, put up or shut up.
"Entirely true" means without exception. Perhaps the cases I personally know are the only exceptions in the world, and if they are then your statement of "entirely true" is false.
Your problem is that you cannot disprove my statements and even supplied third party verification of them while at the same time disproving your claims and you don't like that so you have to resort to lying and straw man arguments to give yourself something to say.
If dumazz chucky would have said 'most' I'd been ok with that because it would be true. I have a problem with people posting false statements as if they were true or factual.
I do not intend to entertain any more discussion on this thread. When I meet someone like you that blatantly lies I have no more time or interest in what they have to say but I don't mind at all exposing you for the liar you are.