Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeMind
How dare you label yourself with the term "Conservative" when you are a blatant liar?

You seem quite happy that a vaccine that has only a 31% effectiveness may become available. Provide my quote that states that or shut up.

You deride someone for saying that staying away from sinful ways virtually guarantees you won’t get AIDS. This is entirely true.

First off, provide my quote where I deride someone for advocating abstaining from 'sinful' ways...and again, put up or shut up.

"Entirely true" means without exception. Perhaps the cases I personally know are the only exceptions in the world, and if they are then your statement of "entirely true" is false.

Your problem is that you cannot disprove my statements and even supplied third party verification of them while at the same time disproving your claims and you don't like that so you have to resort to lying and straw man arguments to give yourself something to say.

If dumazz chucky would have said 'most' I'd been ok with that because it would be true. I have a problem with people posting false statements as if they were true or factual.

I do not intend to entertain any more discussion on this thread. When I meet someone like you that blatantly lies I have no more time or interest in what they have to say but I don't mind at all exposing you for the liar you are.

90 posted on 09/26/2009 1:37:20 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (Kenya? Kenya? Kenya just show us the birth certificate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: Eagle Eye; chuck_the_tv_out
This is going to be fun. I get to pick off your stupid words.

Yes, I said that “you seem quite happy” with the vaccine. After all, you didn't post one negative comment against it in a thread devoted to that very vaccine. However, you do deride someone who says they “have found the 100% perfect AIDS vaccine,” which is to not sleep around. His position may be effective to prevent up to 72% of AIDS cases. If he had added his “vaccine” also required not “doing illegal drugs,” then his vaccine would have been 97.82% effective. Amazingly, none of this would have required another study, nor additional funding from the government.

You said in post #87:

“So when you or anyone else says that it is all about sleeping around or sinful conduct on the part of the one who contracts the disease, you are lying because you know better or should know better.”

Aren't you the one bringing up the word “sinful?” Frankly, staying away from sinful ways would have prevented over 98% of all current AIDS cases. Why aren't you arguing against the vaccine in this thread, for being only 31% effective? You seem highly inconsistent here.

My words were: “You deride someone for saying that staying away from sinful ways virtually guarantees you won’t get AIDS. This is entirely true.” You said that “Entirely true” means without exception. Perhaps the cases I personally know are the only exceptions in the world, and if they are then your statement of ‘entirely true’ is false.” This really shows ignorance on your part.

I said that staying away from sinful ways “virtually guarantees you won't get AIDS.” Independent statistics show that to be completely true (98% effectiveness is a “virtual” guarantee against AIDS). This is what I said was “entirely true”. Again, my words are perfectly stated and provably correct. Open your eyes and your brain.

Please don't entertain any more discussion on this thread. your ignorance, unsupported allegations, and bizarre attitude are really not needed.

91 posted on 09/26/2009 9:18:18 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Liberals have an inability to value good character or to desire it for themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson