Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACORN files suit against filmmakers
politico.com ^ | Sept. 23, 2009 | JAKE SHERMAN

Posted on 09/23/2009 2:35:47 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-220 next last
To: P-Marlowe

If it gets tossed, let the kids sue ACORN!


121 posted on 09/23/2009 3:35:51 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
As mentioned already "Discovery" comes into play. I just wonder if one of those fired "Acorniacs" got hold of a slimey enough lawyer,who is launching the suit strictly for the $$$$$? The "Pimp and Prostitute" don't have any money. How much cash would certain higher ups in Acorn pass on to those who were fired just to "shut up and go away".

Alot of money has potentially been misused,having passed through many hands.How many people in this organization have been taking cuts of Federal Dollars over the years? There may be a substantially HUGE payout to those fired,coming from within Acorn because of the fear of Discovery.This suit smells like a calculated move by the lawyer,leaches don't care where the blood(money)comes from I think.

A dangerous thing this sense of entitlement..... That's my story and I'm sticky

122 posted on 09/23/2009 3:36:01 PM PDT by Grendelgrey (....nay, we are but men..........Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Maryland, especially Baltimore, is such a hellhole, ACORN may win a lawsuit. I wonder if a person in a criminal act has a reasonable expectation of privacy.


123 posted on 09/23/2009 3:36:49 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

ACORN gives scum a bad name.


124 posted on 09/23/2009 3:37:04 PM PDT by The Duke ("Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Democrat Party?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Their not only corrupt, their STUPID!


125 posted on 09/23/2009 3:38:28 PM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I read that it is against the law to film some with out there knowledge in NJ. But what where there claims be for damages in a law suit. Just because someone breaks a law doesn’t prove damages. Would they want to prove in court under oath that they had the reputation harmed because they were filmed suggesting criminal acts?


126 posted on 09/23/2009 3:38:56 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (Your It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

So where do I contribute to James and Hanna’s defense fund?


127 posted on 09/23/2009 3:40:04 PM PDT by Ticonderoga34 (Free Obama's Birth Certificate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Baltimore, the house that the D’Alesandros (as in Nancy D’Alesandro Pelosi) “built.”

You’d better believe the ducks are lining up.


128 posted on 09/23/2009 3:40:24 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Ticonderoga34

complaint
http://www.politico.com/static/PPM116_complaint.html


129 posted on 09/23/2009 3:40:51 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Can’t the filmmakers claim “freedom of the press”?


130 posted on 09/23/2009 3:42:23 PM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Pelosi comes by corruption “honestly”. Places like that are so rotten, there is no fixing them.


131 posted on 09/23/2009 3:43:00 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

http://fundrace.huffingtonpost.com/neighbors.php?type=emp&employer=Brown+Goldstein+Levy


132 posted on 09/23/2009 3:43:11 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: NavySEAL F-16
Exclusive: ACORN Illegally Operating in Maryland http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread501650/pg1 I guess none of that matters. /S Awesome post! Thanks for the information.
133 posted on 09/23/2009 3:43:33 PM PDT by NorwegianViking (Organizing for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fujimoh

I’m not a lawyer, but if I am correct, unlimited discovery ain’t going to happen. It must be germaine to the case and issues that arise in the case.


134 posted on 09/23/2009 3:43:43 PM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
If the defense attunery were to pursue this case, they should start with the fact ACORN never renewed their charter, therefore operations illegally in Maryland.
2nd, Maryland wiretapping law prohibits 3rd party acquired " Intercepts " of electronic communications devices.
135 posted on 09/23/2009 3:44:19 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

goldstein
http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/daniel-goldstein.asp?cycle=08


136 posted on 09/23/2009 3:44:50 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: madison10

In Maryland? Quite possibly.

}:-)4


137 posted on 09/23/2009 3:45:09 PM PDT by Moose4 (Ted Kennedy: "If they bring up Camelot, we get to bring up the lady in the lake.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CrosscutSaw

Let’s just say that I am not speculating.


138 posted on 09/23/2009 3:45:29 PM PDT by Lou Budvis (Palin/Bachmann '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

We’ll break ACORN’s back with this case. Just wait and see. This was probably the worst thing they could have done.


139 posted on 09/23/2009 3:45:30 PM PDT by Hexenhammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
The claim for monetary damages is going no where. But, they might just prevail in their attempt to stop the distribution of the tapes. Of course, these would just be the Maryland-shot tapes and audio.

In fact, they may only be able to restrain the distribution of the audio portion of the tapes. I'm not entirely clear on the case law in this regard.

140 posted on 09/23/2009 3:46:21 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-220 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson