He is the kind of man Obama picked. You can always judge a man by his friends.
Obama is the WRONG man for the job.
I guess schools are safer when he’s in an office in DC.
With this gang, I wonder what will be made safe in these safe schools. Kinda like gun free zones are actually target rich environments.
I thought that homosexuality was about consenting adults in private. That would mean that exposing minors to it in an advocacy role would be corrupting minors.
For the full story on Jennings, go to YouTube and look up the Clews-Todd Report. Brace yourself, it’s pretty graphic.
Jennings does not limit his promotion of homosexuality in schools only to high schools or middle schools. He wrote the foreword for a book titled Queering Elementary Education, which includes an essay declaring that queerly raised children are agents using strategies of adaptation, negotiation, resistance, and subversion.
Perhaps the most dramatic illustration, however, of Jennings unfitness for a safe schools post involves an incident when he taught at Concord Academy, a private boarding school in Massachusetts. In his book One Teacher in Ten (the title is based on the discredited myth, now abandoned even by gay activist groups, that ten percent of the population is homosexual), he tells about a young male sophomore, Brewster, who confessed to Jennings his involvement with an older man he met in Boston. But at a GLSEN rally in 2000, Jennings told a more explicit version of Brewsters story. Jennings here quotes the boy and then comments: I met someone in the bus station bathroom and I went home with him. High school sophomore, 15 years old. That was the only way he knew how to meet gay people.
Did Jennings report this high-risk behavior to the authorities? To the school? To the boys parents? No -- he just told the boy, I hope you knew to use a condom...."
Kevin Jennings -- Unsafe for America's Schools
by Tony Perkins, 6/29/2009:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=32472
Why doesn’t Glenn Beck go after this guy? Afraid of the Gay Mafia?
Not one of Obama's "czars" is even a mainstream liberal.
They are, to a man, woman or, ehh... whatever - radical fringe kooks.
This is not an accident, and we all know it.
There are schools in this nation that are so morally corrupt that it would be better for students never to step foot in them. This is true even if it meant the students remained illiterate and innumerate. ( I **seriously** mean it!)
Innumerate and illiterate can be corrected but spiritual damnation and emotional and psychological corruption may never be.
Too radical? Is there a spectrum of "radical" and is there some acceptable level of it?
I swear, some of the statements of conservatives are an embarrassment.
Go ahead Obama make my day! I am keeping an eagle eye on our school, one that you haven’t destroyed yet, there are plenty of private schools in the area!