Skip to comments.
Are Communists (or neo-Communists) Dangerous? Yes, Bill, they are.
David Horowitz's NewsReal Blog ^
| September 20, 2009
| David Horowitz
Posted on 09/21/2009 10:58:53 AM PDT by HorowitzianConservative
On Friday night, O'Reilly and Beck had a back-and-forth about communism (inspired by Beck's takedown of self-proclaimed communist and presidential adviser Van Jones). O'Reilly opined (I hate that word but he likes it, so there it is) that he was afraid of Islamo-fascists but not of communists. Like many Americans, O'Reilly thinks that because the communist party is almost a thing of the past (it exists but is not and will not be big enough to throw its weight around again), the communist idea is dead. It is not.
It's interesting that we have words like "neo-Nazi" to describe post-Hitler Nazis, and "neo-conservative" to describe liberals who left the Democratic Party when it took a sharp turn to the left, but not "neo-Communist" to describe the massive numbers of people on the left -- and among them very influential people -- who share, almost to the jot and tittle, the old communist view of capitalism, and are prepared to act on that perception.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsrealblog.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: billoreilly; bloggersandpersonal; davidhorowitz; foxnews; neocommunism
To: HorowitzianConservative
O’Reilly can’t help his stupidity.
2
posted on
09/21/2009 11:04:34 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
To: HorowitzianConservative
Communism is socialism.. and is very democratic..
However; democracy is MOb Rule by mobsters.. always in ever iteration.. completely..
The words democracy and democratic are NOWHERE in the American Constitution ANYWHERE.. ON PURPOSE...
3
posted on
09/21/2009 11:07:00 AM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: HorowitzianConservative
Has BOR gone Senile on us What kind of a statement is that we have a Communist in the Whitehouse is he blind as well??
4
posted on
09/21/2009 11:08:31 AM PDT
by
Cheetahcat
(Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
To: b4its2late
I wish that ego centric maniac would try to take his show on the road for a month over at CNN or MSNBC or try another time slot on FOX to see if he still carried his great ratings.
5
posted on
09/21/2009 11:11:25 AM PDT
by
FreeAtlanta
(There is no "O" in Transparency.)
To: b4its2late
No, but he is indeed stupid....obtuse....A-Hole.
6
posted on
09/21/2009 11:12:09 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
To: hosepipe
“Communism is socialism.. and is very democratic..”
Tell that to the “People’s..” of Russia under Lenin rule and
Mao’s “People”.
The body count is still rising, but whose counting.
To: HorowitzianConservative
Are Communists dangerous? Just ask the 100 million people they killed in the 20th century. Oh wait, the dead can’t talk. Nevermind.
8
posted on
09/21/2009 11:18:49 AM PDT
by
TexasRepublic
(Obama = Jim Jones coercing us into suicide on a national scale)
To: This Just In
TRUE “communism” is perfect...............
That’s why it will NEVER work...You throw the human trait into the mix and it will not be “communism”, but socialism.
The human trait of “greed” will cause true communism to fail at any level. Nothing man can do will change that.
9
posted on
09/21/2009 11:26:55 AM PDT
by
Boonie
To: Cheetahcat
O’Reilly shows himself over and over again to be the proverbial mental midget: he is willing to give an actual Communist (incremental as he is) like Obama a VERY wide berth, as long as he can corral Obama into another interview. With B O’R, the old saw about “only doing it for ratings” is closer to the truth than anyone else on FOX./ His show is absolutely INESSENTIAL viewing and only tolerable in tiny doses when his guests are worth hearing or when Laura Ingraham subs for him.
10
posted on
09/21/2009 12:05:44 PM PDT
by
supremedoctrine
(The squeaky wheel doesn't always get the grease. Sometimes it gets replaced.)
To: HorowitzianConservative
Even though he does not realize it BOR is not the brightest bulb on the block. His arrogance gets in the way of reality.
11
posted on
09/21/2009 12:12:58 PM PDT
by
jesseam
(Been there, done that)
To: HorowitzianConservative
Putting danger aside...I don't know Bill do you like living one family to a dwelling? Do you like turning on the faucet and having hot water come out? Do you like having products on the shelves???
BOR needs to go. He's imploding due to his jealousy over Glenn Beck, I think.
12
posted on
09/21/2009 12:16:50 PM PDT
by
riri
(http://rationaljingo.blogspot.com/)
To: supremedoctrine
“OReilly shows himself over and over again to be the proverbial mental midget: he is willing to give an actual Communist (incremental as he is) like Obama a VERY wide berth, as long as he can corral Obama into another interview. With B OR, the old saw about only doing it for ratings is closer to the truth than anyone else on FOX./ His show is absolutely INESSENTIAL viewing and only tolerable in tiny doses when his guests are worth hearing or when Laura Ingraham subs for him.”
Absolutely Right!
13
posted on
09/21/2009 12:39:07 PM PDT
by
Cheetahcat
(Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
To: HorowitzianConservative
Like many Americans, O'Reilly thinks that because the communist party is almost a thing of the past (it exists but is not and will not be big enough to throw its weight around again), the communist idea is dead. It is not. I suspected O'Reilly was either an idiot or a communist sympathizer (must be those IRA roots), and now it is confirmed.
He is either a liar, or he is stupid, or he is evil, and it doesn't matter which.
14
posted on
09/21/2009 12:42:34 PM PDT
by
meadsjn
To: HorowitzianConservative
I don't watch O’Reilly anymore. His his following the same failed marketing plan that the RINO’s followed. He takes his conservative audience for granted and is trying to expand his numbers by attracting “moderates” and the occasional lefty.
To: HorowitzianConservative
Neo-Comms. Now that is an appropriate term. Only problem is they always were Communists.
16
posted on
09/21/2009 1:57:54 PM PDT
by
anymouse
(God didn't write this sitcom we call life, he's just the critic.)
To: HorowitzianConservative
Why ask stupid questions as an article title?
That trend should be done away with...it is quite annoying.
17
posted on
09/22/2009 5:40:38 AM PDT
by
Just A Nobody
( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson