Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mojitojoe; kabar; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; SoldierDad; marron
“The review is due to be completed by the end of this year, and European officials say the outcome is not yet clear. But one official said: “Obama is now driving this process. He is saying these are the president's weapons, and he wants to look again at the doctrine and their role.”

WTHeck! Isn't anyone freaking out in the Pentagon?

268 posted on 09/20/2009 8:35:16 PM PDT by Chgogal (American Mugabe, get your arse out of my bank, my car, my doctor's office & my elec. utility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]


To: Chgogal
. But one official said: “Obama is now driving this process. He is saying these are the president's weapons, and he wants to look again at the doctrine and their role.” _____________ No, they are not his friggin' weapons. We, the people paid for them. I wish that big eared, skinny, ugly, scrawny, Pinko, bastard would take a long walk off a short pier. He's a complete idiot. Photobucket
273 posted on 09/20/2009 8:49:24 PM PDT by mojitojoe (Socialism is just the last “feel good” step on the path to Communism and its slavery. Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

To: Chgogal

Thanks for the ping.

Nuclear weapons are the worst thing in the world except for the alternative which is defeat.

The numbers we have should be tied to an analysis of what it would take to take on two major conventional forces simultaneously.

We face insurgencies and proxy wars because we are presently unbeatable on the conventional battlefield. The moment we give up our conventional war advantage, in that very moment conventional war is what we will face. And we will no longer be unbeatable. We lost 400,000 military dead in about 40 months time in the second world war because we didn’t go in with a decisive advantage, we had to build that advantage on the fly. Next time it will be worse. Next time American cities will burn.

One other thing; negotiating away our nukes doesn’t protect us from nuclear attack anyway. If a nuke hits us it won’t be delivered by an ICBM from China or Russia, it will be delivered in a seatrain shipping container with lots of contradictory arabic chatter in the days leading up to it so in the aftermath we lash out against the sock puppet instead of the hand.


274 posted on 09/20/2009 8:57:50 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

To: Chgogal
“WTHeck! Isn't anyone freaking out in the Pentagon?”
~~~
Hey,,,Maybe they Are freakin’ out,,,

At this point they really can't say anything in public,,,

O’Bammy et al have already grabbed that “Third Rail”,,,

IMO 2010 will be a blood bath for the dems...

279 posted on 09/20/2009 9:33:12 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson