Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Massive Ordnance Penetrator Will Be the Largest Non-Nuclear Bomb Ever
Popular Science ^ | August 3, 2009 | Dan Smith

Posted on 09/19/2009 5:30:50 AM PDT by lbryce

The Pentagon is trying to speed up the deployment of an ultra-large bunker-busting bomb, which would constitute the largest non-nuclear bomb the U.S. has ever used. The Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP, is a 30,000-pound bomb that would dive deeper than any previous bomb, and could be strapped to B-2 or B-52 bombers by July of 2010.

The MOP is 20 feet long and can penetrate bunkers up to 200 feet before exploding. At 15 tons, the MOP is a third heavier than the previous "mother of all bombs", the GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb, which was only 10.5 tons. The MOP also packs a whopping 5,300 lbs of explosives, which is 10 times the amount its predecessor bunker-buster, the BLU-109, carried. Basically, it's massive.

The push for accelerated deployment is due to the increased perceived nuclear threats from Iran and North Korea. It's believed that many of their nuclear programs could be in development underground, below levels of current bunker-busting bombs' range. The Pentagon intends the rapid deployment to send a message that the United States is tweaking strategies to address new threats. And nothing is more American than advertising the sheer size and tonnage of the bombs hanging below our jets.



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: ahmadinejad; bunkerbuster; iran; repost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: A.A. Cunningham

I wouldn’t expect you to be, since you didn’t ‘get’ what I actually did write.....no biggie, LOL

I DO happen to trust that we have the real thing as described.....and that the pics above are of a smaller test version.


21 posted on 09/19/2009 6:04:00 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68 (CALL CONGRESSCRITTERS TOLL-FREE @ 1-800-965-4701)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
Heh-heh....Awww. That's mean... :-) You're mean...:-)
I read the comment posted by Vn_survivor_67-68 only after you brought it to my attention which actually made it funnier....Still, you're mean...:-)
22 posted on 09/19/2009 6:04:55 AM PDT by lbryce (Obama Notwithstanding, America's Best Days Are Yet To Be .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
It's believed that many of their nuclear programs could be in development underground...

Nah, they're past development.

23 posted on 09/19/2009 6:07:39 AM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45

True, naval guns would be of little use in Afghanistan, and 16 inch (or bigger) guns are really too heavy to transport over land. So you have a valid point. But when one considers modern ballistics can increase the range of big guns to 50-100 miles vrs 25 miles for a WW2 gun alot of targets fall within the range of a modern main naval battle gun should anyone ever decide to build one. Space born Kinetic energy weapons would work well for this purpose too. A bit more expensive but a stream of cannon balls with a V of 20,000 mph would do a lot of damage to a harden bunker.


24 posted on 09/19/2009 6:09:01 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

It’s a nice new and beautiful weapon that I’m sure that Israel would love to have but is not really practical for them to use. They’ve got potential trouble enough with that Russian S-300 air defense system, and the reality is that North Korea and Iran can’t be stopped from developing nukes short of a direct war. They saw what happened to Saddam and with nuclear defenses they know that no one will touch them.


25 posted on 09/19/2009 6:14:19 AM PDT by RangerHAAF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

It must show up on earthquake sensors all around. Pretty cool.


26 posted on 09/19/2009 6:19:12 AM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

maybe.....the bulge rising above the surface looks to me more like a thin slab, parking lot style, rather than a large “cube” (if you will) of concrete coming apart......esp if the detonation was the full 200ft down.....I’d guess the surface bulge to be about70-80ft across...

both Iran and NK are full of caves in rock to convert and shore up with concrete and rerod......sinking one 200ft into that would be quite different than beach sand, but these are just PR pics and specs anyway


27 posted on 09/19/2009 6:20:33 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68 (CALL CONGRESSCRITTERS TOLL-FREE @ 1-800-965-4701)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

Not only that, but one can infer a mighty small CPE from the photo as well. I believe there is a small raised ‘target’ object (looks like an access door) that the MOP is striking within about ONE METER of dead center.

And as you suggest, the MOP is designed to penetrate multiple layers of purpose-built bunker concrete. It has some really sophisticated fusing as well as clever explosive design to get the best effect from the blast. It’s not about making a huge crater; it’s about destroying what’s below and next to it.


28 posted on 09/19/2009 6:26:54 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

Can also be used for speedy foundation digging.


29 posted on 09/19/2009 6:27:47 AM PDT by Al Gore Vidal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
200 feet? just doesnt seem possible... How can anything that not a drill penetrate 200 feet?
30 posted on 09/19/2009 6:28:04 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied, the economy died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce; A.A. Cunningham

to both of you, LOL

go to the PS link and what do you see?????

below the three pics the following appears:

8888888888888888888888888888888888
“GBU-24: This GBU-24 bunker buster is tiny in comparison to the new MOP”
http://www.popsci.com/military-aviation-amp-space/article/2009-08/pentagon-wants-deploy-largest-non-nuclear-bomb-next-year
8888888888888888888888888888888888

my my.....frisky this morning, yes? all 3 of us should have clicked the link


31 posted on 09/19/2009 6:28:51 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68 (CALL CONGRESSCRITTERS TOLL-FREE @ 1-800-965-4701)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

Remember, it’s *not* designed to produce a huge crater in the earth. It’s designed to burrow deeply and then damage/destroy/disrupt the ‘stuff’ at depth from shock wave and overpressure. It’s not a conventional ordinance at all.

Think of a hollow point bullet. Small/unimpressive entry wound; massive internal damage.


32 posted on 09/19/2009 6:29:15 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

Not to worry the bulk of the damage occurs where you can’t see it which is, where it is supposed to be, underground.


33 posted on 09/19/2009 6:32:36 AM PDT by thile44 (Simplicity is too complex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Personally, I'm still scared of MOAB -- the Mother of All Bombs

34 posted on 09/19/2009 6:33:05 AM PDT by Zakeet (We wouldn't need Jerry Lewis if we had ObamaCare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

What about taking one of the old 16 inchers, weighting the muzzle and giving it guidance, triggering mechanism to fire it when the muzzle touches the roof of the bunker?


35 posted on 09/19/2009 6:35:59 AM PDT by Quickgun (As a former fetus, I'm opposed to abortion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

Curiously, the largest non-nuclear bombs previously, WW2’s Tall Boy and Grand Slam, were most effective as near misses. A near miss would penetrete deep under the bunker; the explosion would open a tremendous cavity and gravity would do the rest, collapsing the foundations. (see The Dam Busters)


36 posted on 09/19/2009 6:38:02 AM PDT by bt_dooftlook (ACORN = Another Communist-Overrun Rats-Nest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: csvset

I’ll take “Cadillac models we’ll never see for $200.00 Alex”:

What is “The Coupe d’état?”


37 posted on 09/19/2009 6:38:24 AM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9 (Tree of Liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Life is messy. MOP it up.®
38 posted on 09/19/2009 6:38:30 AM PDT by Sender (It's never too late to be who you could have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bt_dooftlook

Yep. Also, there’s nothing to say you can drop these “in series” separated in 30 second intervals.

First one digs a nice hole. Second one digs it deeper. Third one gets to the ‘queen in the nest.’

You can dig, but you can’t really hide.


39 posted on 09/19/2009 6:41:41 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: All

see post # 31........the pics shown are of a much lesser weapon than the “MOP”. This debate means nothing.

I *would* like to see similar pics of an actual MOP such as the above, but I don’t think we will any time soon.


40 posted on 09/19/2009 6:43:43 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68 (CALL CONGRESSCRITTERS TOLL-FREE @ 1-800-965-4701)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson