Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vimto
Here's my bottom line: anybody who is in favor of increased government power and/or increased government social-welfare spending, is not a conservative to me, "neo" or otherwise.

I prefer to think of myself as a "small-l" libertarian, who believes that the proper role of government is to provide a safe and orderly environment for people to live, work, and raise a family, provide a venue to settle disputes, and otherwise stay out of people's hair.

137 posted on 09/19/2009 9:18:36 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625
Yes, and so (now) do I. Classic liberalism has a long and honorable tradition, but sadly lost in the UK with Margaret thatcher the last proponent of it. Even she had difficulty reigning in the growth of the government.

And believe me in the UK I'm waaaaay off the political spectrum.

But the journey had to start somewhere and for me it was most certainly with the neo-cons - and they sounded pretty radical to European ears. Yet they were only a station on the way. Once you get freedom between your teeth you have to take it to the wire.

I know know how socialistic the UK is and I feel disenfranchised. UKIP is our only hope... our conservative party would be in your democratic party.

Respect and regards

144 posted on 09/19/2009 11:07:17 AM PDT by vimto (To do the right thing you don't have to be intelligent - you have to be brave (Sasz))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson