Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: a fool in paradise

This has nothing do this with what the LIC (Liar-in-Chief) wants. This has to do with not knowing the whole story.
If the pro-Obama posters were on public property and allowed by the city then the anti-obama posters should also be allowed. However, if the pro-obama posters were only on private property with the consent of the property owners then the anti-obama posters do not have to be allowed on that same private property. This is about private property rights.
I damn sure don’t want some Obama supporter demanding that I post a pro-obama poster on my property just because I exercised my 1st amendment rights and displayed an anti-obama poster.
We still need to know the facts of this case before it is judged.


39 posted on 09/17/2009 1:39:20 PM PDT by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: TXDuke
The Pro-Bama posters WERE on public property. Lower Westheimer on the traffic light control box on the corner next to the McDonalds.

Also one on lower Westheimer by a school at Hazard again on a traffic light control box.

I'm sure there were others in Houston. Here is a photo from another town:

Shepard Fairey was also responsible for this public art:

There is a double standard at play.

72 posted on 09/17/2009 3:43:53 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Is Jimmy Carter's wife still hanging around with gay serial killers like John Wayne Gacy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson